First Strike Forums — Radeon 9250?

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (Hook&Hammer) — Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:59:21 +0000

Oh wait, im running it at all low, except for dynamic light and lighting, theyre at medium. Viewing distance at max, anti-aliasing at 4x and 1024x768 60hz. I have a 3.2 GHz Pentium 4 (socket 478), 512 MB PC3200, and like i previously said an ATI Radeon 9550. It works fine.

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (Hook&Hammer) — Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:56:11 +0000

MMM the box says minimum req: ATI Radeon 8500... from that viewpoint it should work. I have a radeon 9550 and it works fine. I can even run it at medium settings smoothly. The only thing that stops me from putting it there is the unbearable load time.

ATI Radeon 9550: Summer 2005 www.newegg.com $72.00!!!! AND IT RUNS BF2!!!

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (sgt. fuzz) — Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:18:00 +0000

HEY i've got a PCI slot and i got this awesome Nvidia GeForce 6200 OC 256 MB and it runs perfectly on medium high. It bugs me tho that they COMPLETELY left PCI behind. I might update my motherboard in a year so I can get a PCIe card. Motherboards only cost around a buck50 for a half decent one so that's an option

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (zanth91) — Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:38:23 +0000

y dawg314 make sure you have either PCIe or AGP. If you just have PCI (an older CPU, even 1 year) then you should upgrade, because you can't get much out of PCI except for a Nvidia 5200 or something like that that plays low GFX. I HATE LOW GRAPHICS!

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (Proton8) — Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:24:16 +0000

i recomend the x850 it da bomb

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (y dawg314) — Sun, 05 Mar 2006 16:11:43 +0000

Thanks

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (zanth91) — Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:58:42 +0000

hmm

Well I'll recomend the first one, the 6600GT. I have it and it works great

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (FSDev| Ulversial) — Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:32:19 +0000

I'm running with a radeon 9800 pro, and it's barely handling it (with playable fps, min 30 at most times, dropping to as low as 15 in very intense situations). all settings low and view dist at 70 %. so going far below that card wouldn't be a good idea imho

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (zanth91) — Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:08:08 +0000

If you live in the US, try these...

Nvidia:
cheaper but nice graphics- AGP: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6814130220
PCIe: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6814150098
Hard core, but expensive- AGP: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6814130275
PCIe: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6814130256

ATI:
cheaper but nice graphics- AGP: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6814153018
PCIe: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6814102661
Hard core, but expensive- AGP: none
PCIe: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6814102610
Good Luck...- AGP: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6814153024

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (generalandrew) — Sat, 04 Mar 2006 01:05:22 +0000

If you hold off for just abit, recent news indicates that ATI will be slashing their X1800 256 MB to $200 - $250 to directly compete with nVidia's up-coming GeForce 7900.

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (FSDev| AQUILA) — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 23:31:26 +0000

x series are good, get an x600/700 for about £100

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (y dawg314) — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 23:13:03 +0000

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (FSDev| General Un-Co) — Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:51:54 +0000

I had the 9200 when i first bourght battlefield it wouldn't even install.

Re: Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (EliteNinja) — Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:01:05 +0000

There is no way on Gods green earth that you will be able to play bf2 with that graphics card.

Radeon 9250?

null@example.com (y dawg314) — Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:07:14 +0000

will a Radeon 9250 play battlefield 2?