First Strike Forums — Millennium Falcon

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (Dragunov) — Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:56:40 +0000

xEROhOUR wrote:

Thats Galactic Congress for you all over.

yes and during those congress, democracy felt by a big applaus

Greetz

Dragunov

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (Andrew_Kirk_25) — Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:35:08 +0000

Maybe you can unlock a minigame where you fly those Galactic Senate pods around to play Dodgem Cars. But there is a no head-on collision rule enforced by a comitee, whose chairman mist be chosen by a sub-comitee before the game can start. You get credits for winning which you can use to bribe others or hire a private detective to blackmail people. Or Jango/Boba Fett...

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (FSDev| xEROhOUR) — Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:13:20 +0000

Thats Galactic Congress for you all over.

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (deathmanreturns) — Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:10:12 +0000

"...the honorable representative from the 3,467th district of Kessel now has the floor."

"Thank you madam chairperson, I would like to take the time to bring before this 3rd Galactic Congress the issue of unlawful racing through our sector. While I applaud his effort, Lord Vadar's political platform to 'Restore Peace and Order to the Galaxy' has been uneffective at stopping rogue smugglers from attempting to beat each other's speed records in our Mine Runs. They're so busy wrapping up bragging rights to 'doing the Kessel run in under 12 Parsecs', they don't even see the transport ships that they're constantly running into.

The Galactic Congress' attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time."

Coming up next on InterGalactic CSPAN, watch Senator Binks sign a bill. Stay tuned...

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (Andrew_Kirk_25) — Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:13:33 +0000

David Gilmour wrote:

I played SOME of bf1942.. I have the game.. actualy, i tried to play Galactic Congress.. but cant seem to find the right patch.. everytime i do it still says Wrong Version... but back to the point.. The Aircraft Carriers.. they were drivable.. they hurt you and they did lag horribly.. (when taking off with a plane that is) but it still lagged.. even if you had a ping of 30.. but i guess that could just be because 1942 is a horrible game :-P
EDIT: Also, I played Battlefield: Vietnam.. and they have the helicopters you could jump into the back.. i got inside there and crawled to the very front of it.. and it pushed me out.. and it wasnt doing flips, just taking off.. and going forwards, up and down

Galactic Congress?

That must be boring game......

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (FSDev| RedMonkey999) — Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:07:51 +0000

alright, so it's official now, the MF will be static in Hoth so that takes care of that. As for the rest of the maps, I don't think the MF would fit well in many maps besides maybe Cloud City, Death Star, and Tatooine

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (Dragunov) — Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:38:49 +0000

heydude235 wrote:

Well i think it should be a flyable uav. Also i would like it in hoth like it was in gc

the MF has never had the purpose of an UAV, it was a smuggler ship and just got into the war, cause of Luke and Obi wanted a ride to Alderaan, but got stuck inside the DS (the empire knew the droids were aboard the MF)

and the MF only helped the rebels on some occasions, helping Luke in the battle of Yavin and during the battle of Endor to destroy Death Star II

Greetz

Dragunov

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (generalandrew) — Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:29:06 +0000

Yeah, it should be restricted. Hoth is given.

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (heydude235) — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:58:38 +0000

Well i think it should be a flyable uav. Also i would like it in hoth like it was in gc

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com ([clan]_Jester) — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:52:25 +0000

Hmm. I like the MF. but if it was in real life you wouldnt find a MF in every battle on everyplanet everytime. So to make it for one map or so ahhhh. dont know but its not a fighter anyhow. In what I am saying is, if this is a war between sides you more than likely wouldnt see it in the fight. alot of the same is what you will find. Just opinion.

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (heydude235) — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:38:51 +0000

Well i think the mf should be in the first release

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (generalandrew) — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:31:22 +0000

I hope not, I'd like to see some vehicular transports!

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (Dragunov) — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:05:00 +0000

RedMonkey999 wrote:

here here admin, as we say in the game: "GOOD CALL REF!!!" But seriously, BF2's code changed a lot from 1942 as for walking inside or on moving vehicles. Thats why a lot of mods haven't created moveable naval units, correct? I think I heard that BF2's code would make you die quickly if you were standing on a moving vehicle, even a boat, or in this case a large starship, is this the case?

normally this was fixed in a released patch for BF2

Greetz

Dragunov

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (FSDev| RedMonkey999) — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:57:11 +0000

does anybody know if the new 1.2 patch for BF:2 will address any of the walking around or standingon moving vehicles issues?

Re: Millennium Falcon

null@example.com (Andrew_Kirk_25) — Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:08:13 +0000

heydude235 wrote:

Then u can sit but im sure u can copy the code from bf1942 and put it in bf2.

Why? What's wrong with just taking the transport chopper or boat code from BF2? You don'r need 1942.

Plus, it IS possible to survive insode a behicle in BF2. I know someone who hid inside a Blackhawk once. The pilot flew nice and level, allowing the guy to knife the passengers ans minigunners before shooting the pilot.