First Strike Forums — Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (FSDev| TALON) — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:45:28 +0000

TY2D2 wrote:

We need moooooore Rebel land vehicles!!!!

And once more, with feeling!

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (Talon1579) — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:58:47 +0000

There's the T-2 and T-4 tanks from EAW, as well as the Combat Landspeeder from Bf1 and the AAC-1 from Bf2. All look pretty canon.

This might help:

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Category … e_vehicles

(look under T for the four rebel tanks. The T1 and T3 (orignally form Force commander) are already being included accoridng to the webstie.

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (TY2D2) — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:03:46 +0000

We need moooooore Rebel land vehicles!!!!

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (TY2D2) — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:02:30 +0000

We need moooooore Rebel land vehicles!!!!

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (RevanJOM) — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:34:24 +0000

Want me to find a list of any Reb vehicle I come across?

[EDIT]- SORRY! THIS IS IMPERIAL. Ah crap.

erg...well, here's one right off the bat. But eh...

The ULAV. That's sadly the only shot I found. Eh. I'll find a few better vehicles...

ground?

Ah! Nother better frontal picture

[EDIT]- SORRY! THIS IS IMPERIAL. Ah crap.

Info:

Production information
Manufacturer

Sienar Fleet Systems
Model

Ultra-Light Assault Vehicle
Class

Repulsorcraft
Technical specifications
Length

7 meters
Maximum speed

400 km/h
Armament

* Twin laser cannon (1: fire-linked)
* Concussion grenade launcher (1)
* Medium blaster cannon (1: rear)

Crew

* Pilot (1)
* Gunner (1)

Usage
Role(s)

* Heavy Cavalry

[EDIT]- SORRY! THIS IS IMPERIAL. Ah crap.

Edit 2-

Ok, found a great transport.

HTT-26 heavy troop transport
Production information
Manufacturer

Gallofree Yards
Model

HTT-26 heavy troop transport
Class

Repulsorcraft
Usage
Role(s)

Mechanized infantry

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (Talon1579) — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:58:46 +0000

The AT-PT is on the main website already, so I assumed you were including that.

Anyway, what we really need are rebel vehicles.

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (FSDev| Woodrow) — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:52:48 +0000

yarr matey. here be the tank I was thinkin' about.

Though I wouldn't mind seeing an eventual crack at the AT-PT eventually

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (FSDev| TALON) — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:13:38 +0000

If you're talking about a Bf2142 style orbital strike it'll most likely be just that, a bombardment from capital ships in low orbit, Imperial Star Destroyer or MC80 Mon Cal Cruiser I'd guess.

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (RevanJOM) — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:46:25 +0000

The reason I suggested the artillery at least, is because at least they should have some sort of strike like thing. Whether it be tie bombing, these, or w/e. I know Tie Bombers and Y-wings are a definate since I read them. But I said eh, wth, when you guys go for EU (during G.C.W.) then you might as well model these puppies.

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (Talon1579) — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:23:46 +0000

Force commander is war more starwarsy than Empire at War, in my opinion.

nd as well know, the fact that there are only two land battles in the movies kind of inhibit things.

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (FSDev| xEROhOUR) — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:47:51 +0000

FSDev| TALON wrote:

Yeah, I tend to not go with any of the vehicles from those series, they just don't come across as Star Warsy (is that a word? ) enough for me. I think sticking with majorly canon material is the way to go to keep this Star Wars mod as accurate the movies as possible.

*thumbsupIcon*

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (FSDev| TALON) — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:29:20 +0000

Yeah, I tend to not go with any of the vehicles from those series, they just don't come across as Star Warsy (is that a word? ) enough for me. I think sticking with majorly canon material is the way to go to keep this Star Wars mod as accurate to the movies as possible.

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (FSDev| xEROhOUR) — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:18:18 +0000

Have to agree with Woody here, Hover would have been the way to go. And as for the size of the thing it looks cumbersome to me and very un-star warsy. A prime example of someone making a vehicle up with no thought about its origins hoping it will slide into SW lore. Patooeey!

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (MK4210) — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:54:28 +0000

http://www.lucasarts.com/products/force … fault2.htm
I think that this is it. Not sure though, been awhile since I played Force Commander.

Re: Imperial SPMA-T Artillery, Imperial AT-AA, and Rebel MPTL-2A Artillery

null@example.com (zanth91) — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:06:37 +0000

I like the idea of the AT-AA (with legs!). Though, it may be better for a later release.