<![CDATA[First Strike Forums — Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?id=410 Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:36:50 +0000 PunBB 1.4.5 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6515#p6515 explain?

]]> Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:36:50 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6515#p6515 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6509#p6509 Ok....

]]> Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:29:46 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6509#p6509 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6453#p6453 Nusirilo wrote:

Yes, we compromised on this issue for the sake of gameplay, stating that this would be a less powerful version of the stationary E-Web, meaning that it would not require a battery or several persons to operate.

does there really exist an E-web without an extra battery? smile

or maybe when the heavy gunner places the gun, he could aslo place the battery smile

mechag2 wrote:

I would love to see orbital strikes implemented. The empire was going to use orbital bombardment before they assaulted Hoth, but the energy shield protecting Echo base was too strong. Of course when the assault fleet landed it was no longer necessary.

Because of the geological restrictions, the rebels were not able to conceal the main power generator under ground like originally planned. Making it an easy target for the empire.

they better put something on the generator, like some camouflage

]]> Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:21:45 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6453#p6453 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6435#p6435 I would love to see orbital strikes implemented. The empire was going to use orbital bombardment before they assaulted Hoth, but the energy shield protecting Echo base was too strong. Of course when the assault fleet landed it was no longer necessary.

Because of the geological restrictions, the rebels were not able to conceal the main power generator under ground like originally planned. Making it an easy target for the empire.

]]> Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:00:41 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6435#p6435 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6373#p6373 A lot like real life.  The M60E3 machine gun is supposed to be operated on a tripod by three men, but up until a few years ago when better machine guns were developed, the US Navy SEALs used it as a one man shoulder fired weapon.

]]> Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:57:39 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6373#p6373 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6331#p6331 Oh, whoops. Ok, then it probably won't have the batter then.

]]> Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:35:02 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6331#p6331 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6330#p6330 Yes, we compromised on this issue for the sake of gameplay, stating that this would be a less powerful version of the stationary E-Web, meaning that it would not require a battery or several persons to operate.

]]> Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:34:30 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6330#p6330 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6329#p6329 Dragunov wrote:

but it had a battery, so maybe an engineer can build it and a gunner shoot with it?

It would kill gameplay if you needed to call over an Engineer just to build a battery for you. It would be pretty frustrating if you got a perfect shot lined up but you can't fire the gun because there's no Engineer around.

generalandrew wrote:

No, I think we'll be seeing these as permenant emplacements.

The FS website says it'll be carried by the "Heavy Weapons" class.

]]> Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:31:43 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6329#p6329 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6294#p6294 No, I think we'll be seeing these as permenant emplacements.

]]> Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:20:40 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6294#p6294 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6246#p6246 but it had a battery, so maybe an engineer can build it and a gunner shoot with it?

]]> Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:16:33 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6246#p6246 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6081#p6081 Yeah, that's it.

]]> Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:22:29 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6081#p6081 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6075#p6075 The Snowtroopers used an E-Web heavy repeating blaster, and yeah, they're putting it in the mod.

http://www.starwars.com/databank/techno … index.html

]]> Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:12:31 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6075#p6075 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6069#p6069 I forgot the name, but there was a repeating blaster used by the Ice Troopers on a tripod. I think that may be implamented.

]]> Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:04:07 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6069#p6069 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6066#p6066 generalandrew wrote:

Oh, ok. Thanks for the pictures.

No problem. cool

I'd like to see this blaster implemented in the mod, personally.

]]> Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:00:39 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6066#p6066 <![CDATA[Re: Artillery in FS?]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6064#p6064 Oh, ok. Thanks for the pictures.

]]> Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:58:14 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6064#p6064