First Strike Forums — Sand People's Fury

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:13:10 +0000

So funny. "Well, if you want FUN, go play Battlefront, not OUR mod". LOL!!!

Would you kindly not turn what I write upside down.

From looking at the servers running your mod, it looks like people are doing a lot of things OTHER than playing this boring-a$$ mod.

First of all, try to be a little respectful. Second of all, you have no way of knowing that's why the servers are empty, and you know it, so stop being dishonest. It won't work.

This board needs an ignore list.

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:02:15 +0000

I think its an ugly setting, no point to it, would take time away from developing better maps and I dont want to be listening to tusken screams and pig squeels.

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (Bandu) — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:58:50 +0000

At the end of the day there is no reason whatsoever why a map like this wont be made.

We dont have any plans for it atm but you never know in the future. Id be very very suprised if you didnt get to play as tuskens , rodiens etc in the future.

No need to sweat it...

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (TY2D2) — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:34:03 +0000

frankts1 wrote:

So funny. "Well, if you want FUN, go play Battlefront, not OUR mod". LOL!!!
From looking at the servers running your mod, it looks like people are doing a lot of things OTHER than playing this boring-a$$ mod.

Leave

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (Bones334) — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:19:41 +0000

frankts1 wrote:

So funny. "Well, if you want FUN, go play Battlefront, not OUR mod". LOL!!!
From looking at the servers running your mod, it looks like people are doing a lot of things OTHER than playing this boring-a$$ mod.

Battlefront is lame its wayyyyy to arcadey.

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (Canadiens1160) — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:16:22 +0000

frankts1 wrote:

So funny. "Well, if you want FUN, go play Battlefront, not OUR mod". LOL!!!
From looking at the servers running your mod, it looks like people are doing a lot of things OTHER than playing this boring-a$$ mod.

I don't think anyone would miss you if you choose not to play anymore

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (frankts1) — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:47:53 +0000

So funny. "Well, if you want FUN, go play Battlefront, not OUR mod". LOL!!!

From looking at the servers running your mod, it looks like people are doing a lot of things OTHER than playing this boring-a$$ mod.

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (Canadiens1160) — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:07:02 +0000

I think the goal is not total, boring realism. It's accurate, fun, non-gimmicky, rewarding gameplay.

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (yultemsee) — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:21:55 +0000

maybe a map with jabbas palace in it but not one just about it.

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (Geez) — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:16:04 +0000

frankts1 wrote:

It's a GREAT idea, and it SHOULD have a place in FS. You guys will kill this mod with realism.

Well go play Battlefront then, I want the realism to remain TBH.

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:41:04 +0000

Speaking for myself, I agree fully with Ty.

you guys are hellbent on sacrificing FUN for REALISM and the result will be empty servers.

With all due respect, I find what you're proposing to be more silly than fun. I don't want another Battlefront with complete randomness and no real immersion. I don't want Rebels fighting Imperials on Naboo with Gungan support, or Dark Troopers and Darth Vaders found on every map. If you want a 'fun' SW experience, play Battlefront - it really is a great alternative if you love arcade gaming. The devs seem to have a far more realistic approach to FS, though.

On a more practical note, I don't see how Jabba's guards could be used in other maps than the palace. So it'd be a lot of work making models and weapons and equipment for one map only. If I was a mod developer, I'd only implement a new 'nation' if I knew it would see plenty of action. So I don't see your idea becoming reality any time soon.

[/personal opinion]

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (frankts1) — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:55:09 +0000

Well, speaking for MYself again, you guys are hellbent on sacrificing FUN for REALISM and the result will be empty servers.

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (TY2D2) — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:37:43 +0000

Umm, its called an opinion?

I don't think Sand people vrs Jabbas gaurds has anything to do with the GCW? Hmm, yea no it didn't. And this mod is about the grunts of the GCW, the major armies, for the most part Rebels and Imperials.

I don't see how the green pigs and sand people fighting over a palace fits in to all that? There wasn't even a backstory provided that ties it in with the war. Just said that it _could_ happen while Jabba was out with luke?

I don't see why you feel the need to attack my opinions, Canadiens. I don't speak for the mod team, I speak for myself.

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (BlasterFreak) — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:38:53 +0000

Canadiens1160 wrote:

BlasterFreak wrote:
TY2D2 wrote:
It would be lots of fun, but it doesn't have a place in FS.
How so? Same era, same known planet, it's star wars. Rebels vs Imps is fine and all, but a small change for kicks doesn't hurt.
Ty has a habit of making grand, sweeping statements speaking for the mod team. You have to parse through it.

I'll keep that in mind then.

Re: Sand People's Fury

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:20:10 +0000

Hehe, Ty, repeat after me: "I'm a tester, not a dev". Repeat 100 times.
I tend to forget that myself sometimes, actually, methinks.