First Strike Forums — transport`s (jepps)

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (squalla2) — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:12:31 +0000

jeep/APC speeder great ide lance

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (Lance Haith) — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:26:04 +0000

Meh the devs could always do gameplay tweaks... I mean the APC in vanilla murders infantry but a couple shots kill it too.

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:36:34 +0000

Just thinking outloud.

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (squalla2) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:40:28 +0000

look at the first page Stardestroyersarecool

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (jedi-ftank) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:53:09 +0000

Stardestroyersarecool wrote:

How about this: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Arrow-23 … andspeeder

looks kinda fast and armored thats a bad combination for the other team

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:57:42 +0000

How about this: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Arrow-23 … andspeeder

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (yultemsee) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:48:34 +0000

well i read the 40 thing on wookiepedia as much as you want to trust that. but it would be reall cool to have an inside for the at-at as it goes slow enough.

squalla2 wrote:

but I realy like a small fast trasport but shud have cover from small arms fire and a gun turret like the vanilla. Transports in game is a deaf trap

i agree but the new transport would have to be much slower then the speeder otherwise it would be too hard to kill. the transports in 2142 were so easy to kill

would it be better to have small aircraft doing the transports job

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (squalla2) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:30:33 +0000

but I realy like a small fast trasport but shud have cover from small arms fire and a gun turret like the vanilla. Transports in game is a deaf trap

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:24:16 +0000

yultemsee wrote:

Stardestroyersarecool wrote:
Maybe the at-at will act as a transport.
it is supposed to be able to carry 40 troops

In lore or in fs?

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:07:45 +0000

how to get down from a at-at

Just like you get down from an AT-ST. Hit 'e', appear on the ground.

I want to see how a game would play when you don't have tards bailing out a choppers (killing all on board) to parachute down and cap a point. No in FS you would have to land it to get out (and not die). Not to mention their is nothing like a calm quiet air ride when suddenly flack gets tossed your way but you some how miraculously land and fight the good fight

Fond GC and PR memories ensue.

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (Lance Haith) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:43:43 +0000

I just really want an air transport.

I want to see how a game would play when you don't have tards bailing out a choppers (killing all on board) to parachute down and cap a point. No in FS you would have to land it to get out (and not die). Not to mention their is nothing like a calm quiet air ride when suddenly flack gets tossed your way but you some how miraculously land and fight the good fight

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (squalla2) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:11:03 +0000

how to get down from a at-at is the big problem

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:30:30 +0000

Give it a full set of passenger seats and have it act as a spawn point. Worked just fine in GC, and makes it an even more formidable opponent, as it'll never be without infantry escort as long as players want to protect it.

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (yultemsee) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:47:59 +0000

Stardestroyersarecool wrote:

Maybe the at-at will act as a transport.

it is supposed to be able to carry 40 troops

Re: transport`s (jepps)

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:42:59 +0000

Maybe the at-at will act as a transport.