First Strike Forums — Interface needs an overhaul

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (TIEpilot234) — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:33:38 +0000

Yep...like in PR...

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:07:22 +0000

The FS mortar is an antipersonell weapon, isn't it? It's way too inaccurate to target AT-STs anyhow.

That would be why there is the rocket launcher

And the explosive charges and EMP carried by the Support player, and the mines and EMP grenades carried by the HWS.

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (TY2D2) — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:56:43 +0000

DS_Arbiter wrote:

Also what is a good idea to improve is that gun that shoots the red mortar like rounds and does NO damage to walkers

Every weapons does damage to walkers and all other vehicles. Just not as much as others.

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (Omen) — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:41:00 +0000

DS_Arbiter wrote:

Also what is a good idea to improve is that gun that shoots the red mortar like rounds and does NO damage to walkers

That would be why there is the rocket launcher

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (DS_Arbiter) — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:35:57 +0000

Also what is a good idea to improve is that gun that shoots the red mortar like rounds and does NO damage to walkers

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:58:12 +0000

Even now,I still get confused when I take out a mine,I'm not sure is it anti-armour or anti-personnel.

1. Deploy near squadmate.
2. If squadmate dies, you're carrying antipersonell mines.
3. Use remaining mines to the best of their potential.

(Psst, Support carries antipersonnel mines, HWS carries antitank mines. Makes sense because it's HWS that's got the antitank rocket launcher).

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (inund8) — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:36:26 +0000

Jamix wrote:

Indubidally

I was reading through this post and was thinking of saying that

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:50:03 +0000

Until this is implemented, which I hope it is, I recommend playing in windowed mode, with the FS Wiki available in a web browser.

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:29:38 +0000

I concur.

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (Jamix) — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:19:34 +0000

Indubidally

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (Terrorek) — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:07:30 +0000

Very much so. Oh, and add a space between "Mos" and "Espa".

Still waiting for the map: Encounter at Mos Def...

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (nadicus) — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:27:07 +0000

Certainly

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (Emperor Norton I) — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:09:46 +0000

Quite

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:27:05 +0000

Indeed.

Re: Interface needs an overhaul

null@example.com (TY2D2) — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:20:35 +0000

Canadiens1160 wrote:

This is a much needed improvement, indeed.