jedi-ftank wrote:

TY2D2 wrote:

1, your signature is too big

Well your old signature with 2 pictures was the same

pwned

Is respect unheard of in the interweb? It was his OLD siggy too.

yultemsee wrote:

dark forces 2 would make a good film.

i actually liked the story in halo shame about the gameplay

Jedi Knight was an excellent game!  I still play it occasionally.  The cutscenes I felt were very unique to the game as well.  Live actors plus all the computerized Star Wars components were very well done.

All those jedi games are in a movie it's called star wars

dark forces 2 would make a good film.

i actually liked the story in halo shame about the gameplay

Jedi Knight was an excellent game!  I still play it occasionally.  The cutscenes I felt were very unique to the game as well.  Live actors plus all the computerized Star Wars components were very well done.

TY2D2 wrote:

1, your signature is too big

Well your old signature with 2 pictures was the same

pwned

i actually liked the story in halo shame about the gameplay

3 brothers

i dunno about 3 but 4 brothers is My favorite movie EVER!!!!
What's mass effect about if it'll make such a good movie?

And SD my point still stands ^^, and its not misguided at all

TY2D2 wrote:

Lance Haith wrote:

Uhm what story would that be? BF2142 was not MEANT to have a strong story... I mean come on! ITs a game that gives us an excuse for a third world war and some fancy new vehicles to tear each other apart. Now the 2142 universe is very flimsy because it was meant to be, they were making a purely multiplayer game that survives only on want of the players to play more.

Did I ever say it was or needed to be?

*Rolls eyes*

Yers right. My apoligies. I think I was using you're quote to also fill in for all the other people talking about a flimsy story. My point was it has a flimsy story because it needed only an excuse. It could be made into a movie or book, but obviously the  movie or book would embelish and introduce more elements.

SD: Do you send a detachment of 5 or so men all over occupied France to find 1 guy and tell him his brother is dead so he doesn't need to fight? Uhm that would be the Gimmick as that doesn't actually HAPPEN. The movie's plot was an excuse to have a series of WWII battles on different areas.

Plus Ragnorok is right too.

3 brothers

Stardestroyersarecool wrote:

Wtf is gimicky or bad about the setting of saving private ryan?

WW2 been done to death and beyond by movies and games.   Its gimiky because if ya do a WW2 movie your gunna get a good turn out no matter the craptasticness of the actual movie (Pearl Harbor anyone?).   Its bad because its unoriginal and the sign of stagnation in movies.

In your misguided opinion anyway. Though I do agree with the games part.

Lance Haith wrote:

TY2D2 wrote:

2, No, I don't really like the cookie cutter sci-fi story of 2142...

Uhm what story would that be? BF2142 was not MEANT to have a strong story... I mean come on! ITs a game that gives us an excuse for a third world war and some fancy new vehicles to tear each other apart. Now the 2142 universe is very flimsy because it was meant to be, they were making a purely multiplayer game that survives only on want of the players to play more.

Did I ever say it was or needed to be?

*Rolls eyes*

Yers right. My apoligies. I think I was using you're quote to also fill in for all the other people talking about a flimsy story. My point was it has a flimsy story because it needed only an excuse. It could be made into a movie or book, but obviously the  movie or book would embelish and introduce more elements.

SD: Do you send a detachment of 5 or so men all over occupied France to find 1 guy and tell him his brother is dead so he doesn't need to fight? Uhm that would be the Gimmick as that doesn't actually HAPPEN. The movie's plot was an excuse to have a series of WWII battles on different areas.

Plus Ragnorok is right too.

Wtf is gimicky or bad about the setting of saving private ryan?

WW2 been done to death and beyond by movies and games.   Its gimiky because if ya do a WW2 movie your gunna get a good turn out no matter the craptasticness of the actual movie (Pearl Harbor anyone?).   Its bad because its unoriginal and the sign of stagnation in movies.