First Strike Forums — ATAT Walkers

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (inund8) — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:07:30 +0000

too much PR?
sometimes I forget to use the minimap in FS after playing alot of PR

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:24:12 +0000

.....Now I feel stupid. Why didnt I think of that?:rolleyes:

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:32:41 +0000

And F11? And F12? And the minimap?

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (VideoZombie) — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:18:11 +0000

Stardestroyersarecool wrote:

I assume you mean like the half tracks and c47's in 1942 and its expansions. Yes that sounds good. But there needs to be away for the passengers to know where the at-at is, otherwise you get people hopping in and out the whole time.

You mean like F10?

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:45:43 +0000

I assume you mean like the half tracks and c47's in 1942 and its expansions. Yes that sounds good. But there needs to be away for the passengers to know where the at-at is, otherwise you get people hopping in and out the whole time.

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:57:01 +0000

Having your model sit in a seat with the interior around you would be great for immersion, so I hope they keep it.

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (S-Guy) — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:21:03 +0000

I hope we can walk around inside...In...that mod...that we're not supposed to mention...It was my favorite part of the AT-AT that to me, kept it from being, "Just another one of those AT-AT Walkers".
To me it was, "My freakin awesome mobile base".

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (TY2D2) — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:02:06 +0000

Well Just to let you know, he said we are going to test it if we can walk around inside or not, so the interior will be there most likely, which means there is no reason the players positions can't be put into the seats if walking around inside is impossible.

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:39:29 +0000

So was I.

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (inund8) — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:30:38 +0000

yultemsee wrote:

maybe if you cant move around the at-at when you get inside you are in a seat instead so you can still look around it.

I was thinking this too, I mean why cant it act as a sort of troop carrier...

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (yultemsee) — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:07:02 +0000

maybe if you cant move around the at-at when you get inside you are in a seat instead so you can still look around it.

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (S-Guy) — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:00:33 +0000

Wow...it was actually censored? lolz...that's pretty funny.

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (FSDev| RedMonkey999) — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:59:03 +0000

Y'know, the wrod 'GC' was censored at one point on these forums due to the excessive comparisons between the two mods...perhaps now would be a good time to turn on the filter again. I've seen quite a few people stating that FS should be GC2 over the past few months and it's a little bit irritating.

As for a useable interior for the ATAT, that is unlikely due to people lagging through the floors while the thing is moving, but we will no doubt test to see if it's possible.

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (FSDev| JayBiggS) — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:08:41 +0000

S-Guy wrote:

Wasn't one of the goals to make a new mod to be basically a successor to GC?

Also I too would LOVE to see the AT-AT on another map than Hoth. Maybe Dantooine or something

Re: ATAT Walkers

null@example.com (S-Guy) — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:00:37 +0000

I think the AT-AT should have an interior that you can walk around in...no...im not going to say, "Like in **censored**.". I really like to be able to explore moving vehicles and access their mounting points manually. I also like opening and closing hatches...i don't really know why, i just do.