It seems to me than the Supports and Heavys Light Blaster rifles are in a moving battle at short range better than the Troopers Rifle.

How it should be:
Troopers Standard Rifle (E11 & Blasttech A 20)
suitable: Rushing, possible counter sniping
Not suitable: Camping in full auto

Fixed Scope
Full Auto, 3 Shoot Burst, Semi Auto

Accurate then fired un zoomed while moving.
Fast overheating in full auto

Only small benefits on accuracy then fired from prone position, moderate benefit the fired from crouch.

High Damage a short range, quickly dropping (but still enough power to kill with one head shoot)

Supports Standard light Blaster (Bowcaster & MG 15 Light Blaster Rifle)
suitable: MG Camping, possible Counter sniping
Not suitable: Rushing

small variable Scope
Full Auto, Semi Auto 

Accurate then fired un zoomed while moving.
medium overheating in full auto

Medium benefit on accuary then fired from prone position, high benefit the fired from crouch.

Medium Damage a short range, slowly dropping (but still enough power to kill with one headshoot)

Heavy Weapons Standard Light Blaster (Light Repeating Blaste)
suitable: MG Camping
Not suitable: Rushing,  possible Counter sniping

no Scope
Full Auto 

small overheating in full auto

High benefit on accuracy then fired from prone position, medium benefit the fired from crouch.

High Damage a short range, fast dropping

Accuracy the getting prone, all weapons:
As in Vanilla BF 2142.
The first seconds worst then standing or crouching, after that as above.

Support Weapons
As in Vanilla:

Support Weapons accuracy should increase if they are fired in full auto (Tracers).

Reason:
Support Weapons should be used to block a enemies path with a large ammount of fire.
If they lose accuracy, the first shoots are deadly, but after the first shoots you can run trough the fire.

If the shoots get more accurate, it would be dangerous to run across the fire.
But the Gun will be still limited by overheating and ammunition.

I think all infantry projectile weapons need a 15-30% boost in accuracy across the board.  Most FS infantry engagements are at long range, and that kind of increase in accuracy will not ruin the "blaster bolts flying about" Star Wars-y feel.

That will, however, allow you to finish someone off realistically point-blank circle strafing them with a big heavy gun, instead of emptying an entire clip with moderate hits as it is now.

I'm going to agree here. Increase the accuracy universally by a slight margin, and allow the bowcaster to be used more effectively by increasing its overall accuracy

That will, however, allow you to finish someone off realistically point-blank circle strafing them with a big heavy gun, instead of emptying an entire clip with moderate hits as it is now.

The rockets could do with a speed/accuracy boost, as the amount of times I have shot a rocket at a tank from a distance for it to veer of, and then I get a Laser in my face is unfair.

Proxy mines need to go aswell, I agree.  They are something you can NOT attack against if you are in a rush to get to a certain place.  Someway of disarming them, or getting past them so they don't blow up (Crouching like in Vanilla..?)

As for the officer. That kit is great. Pistols Accuracy and Damage is fine. I use it whenever I have the oppertunity too. However I feel the area scan should be able to get resupplied when its empty. Even if it just takes a super long time. Not quite accuracy based, but its on the subject.

(Keeping unlimited detonation packs doesn't kill fun. In fact 2 are not enought.)

Edit : a class (support ?) should be able to deactivate all kind of mines.

1) prox mines.  Remove them.  I'm sick of them being tossed about by people looking for cheap and easy kills.  They are a no-skill no-defence-against weapon bordering on exploitive in nature and entirely against the way we designed gameplay.  Personally I want em gone from the mod and replaced with something more interesting.

2) After examining the stats on the weapons the DH-17 pistol seems to be a bit high up.  It was originally designed to be stronger but slightly slower firing than the imperial pistols.  I am guessing that this also makes it the slightly better long-range pistol weapon (though all our pistols were designed as a long-range backup weapon just in case you needed it.  Not very realistic but gamewise it is quite nice and believeable enough).  Even combining both imperial pistol stats together-the rebels only have 1 but the imps have 2 models-it comes out ahead by a clear margin.  I'd say bring it down to the same values as the imperial pistols to even out the discrepency.

3) with the removal of the prox mines the bowcaster/mg15 could possibly have slightly better firing-zoneout settings.  That is assuming the prox mine is replaced by something useful but not by something that is just as deadly.

4) the medic carbine weapons, at worst, could do with slightly less firing zoneout deviation.  Personally I think they're fine and fit right where they are supposed to balance wise.  It should be realised that only the weapons in the first two kits are supposed to be the big fighting ones.  The support kits are meant to provide support, not be soldiers in and of themselves. 

5) PMG could use .5 less splash damage on its explosionradius setting

6) If it was possible to speed up the bolts on all the weapons then I'd say go for it.  This is where most of the perceived inaccuracy comes from due to the effect the slower bolts have over long range.  This does have all the inherent visibility problems we encountered the first time round though, so I wish luck to whomever tries it.  But increasing the standard accuracy settings on the rifles I disagree with for many reasons.  Though I'll save that discussion for another time and place.

7) distribute the Bounty Hunter kit onto all the infantry maps.  High time we see that thing out there