First Strike Forums — Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (TIEpilot234) — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:31:52 +0000

Ok, but WILL we be able to trip the AT-ATs, and possibly AT-STs with the snowspeeders/landspeeders?

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:00:59 +0000

By no means, Gaiden, it'd be interesting was if AT-ATs really were all-terrain. Actually, it'd be awesome if they could just go straight through trees if they were on a map with woods, because I imagine they'd just cut them down, like tanks run down trees in real life.

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (BlasterFreak) — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:37:57 +0000

Safe-Keeper wrote:

Battlefront was a great game if you didn't mind the thousand inconsistencies and liked an arcade approach. As such, it was similar to RS.
And to be honest, I didn't really like BF, and definitely didn't like BF2.

Battlefront soon put me of because of its major lag, it was a nice little game. But not fun enough, just my opinion.

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (F22Gaiden) — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:16:51 +0000

Ok Ok... obviously the AT-AT walks... I just have one question... Snow speeders. Will they have the tow cable to bring down General Viers' gigantic walker? Oh and on the question of will it tilt on hills and stuff. I believe it should be able to go through some hills on the account that AT-AT means - All-Terrain-Armored-Transport. In my opinion, anything a quad can get over, the AT-AT should be able to get over. Am I wrong to compare the AT-AT to a quad? I mean it seems right to me. Ok, I got my 2 cents in... let the Gaiden bashing begin.

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:14:57 +0000

I liked battlefront because its was the first game I played where it was star wars in a battlefield setting.

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (Safe-Keeper) — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:27:10 +0000

Battlefront was a great game if you didn't mind the thousand inconsistencies and liked an arcade approach. As such, it was similar to RS.

And to be honest, I didn't really like BF, and definitely didn't like BF2.

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (TY2D2) — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:43:32 +0000

I wouldn't say that again, your gunna get sliced and diced by a lightsaber

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:30:33 +0000

Jimwalker-NL wrote:

Stardestroyersarecool wrote:
Have you guys looked at how the at-at walks in star wars battlefront? I think it looks pretty good.
HE mentoined Battlefront.
But seriously. It's mostly the BF2142 engine the Dev's are having problems with. They know how the walker should walk.

Battlefront is a good game, but I hate battlefront 2

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (Kayin) — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 08:03:01 +0000

I have understood that AT-ST is made onto bf2142 walker, so it acts pretty much same way in most situations. Or have I understood wrong? And I am really passionately waiting for real size AT-AT walking towards me. Just imaging it gives me chills

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:38:18 +0000

Stardestroyersarecool wrote:

Have you guys looked at how the at-at walks in star wars battlefront? I think it looks pretty good.

HE mentoined Battlefront.

But seriously. It's mostly the BF2142 engine the Dev's are having problems with. They know how the walker should walk.

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:24:58 +0000

Have you guys looked at how the at-at walks in star wars battlefront? I think it looks pretty good.

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (Sasquatch) — Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:53:11 +0000

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (generalandrew) — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 02:10:48 +0000

This has been brought up several times before in different threads. Some people think that if the Imperials have speeder bikes, it's not fair to the Rebels, and others argue that it should be included because it's in the movie. No decision that I know of has been posted or announced, so we'll just have to wait.

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (y dawg314) — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:18:24 +0000

Will AT ATs really be big enough to carry 20 troops and a speeder bike?

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

null@example.com (RevanJOM) — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:57:01 +0000

Very good explanation.