<![CDATA[First Strike Forums — Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?id=8161 Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:55:29 +0000 PunBB 1.4.5 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=116621#p116621 S-Guy wrote:

*Duke Nukem Forever Flashback*

Noooooooo! >_<

heh i've seen gameplay of duke nukem forever that is a couple of months old big_smile looked nice

]]> Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:55:29 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=116621#p116621 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=116613#p116613 *Duke Nukem Forever Flashback*

Noooooooo! >_<

]]> Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:31:51 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=116613#p116613 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=115720#p115720 When its done.

]]> Sat, 20 Sep 2008 23:31:08 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=115720#p115720 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=115718#p115718 when will 1.35 be out?

]]> Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:01:32 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=115718#p115718 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114872#p114872 Eh, I know. It's further out than the original trilogy. The most I can really hope for is getting a V-Wing once we exhaust the original trilogy of it's content, which, as we know, will take quite a while. big_smile

]]> Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:36:13 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114872#p114872 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114832#p114832 I'm glad to keep you happy bud, although I wouldn't hold your breath for the V-wing.

]]> Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:33:53 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114832#p114832 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114828#p114828 Remember my dusty old thread that mentioned the T-16?
http://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?id=6869
I'm almost ashamed to post that link, considering how childish I used to be. *eye twitches* Anyway, I'm happy to see that Hoth is looking good and even happier to see that I'll be flying---ok, let's be serious, crashing, my very own T-16. tongue

]]> Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:32:40 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114828#p114828 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114591#p114591 Lots of them. They may be in disguise as RT members though, so better shoot any you see to be sure wink

]]> Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:10:06 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114591#p114591 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114582#p114582 There going to be any wamprats you have to shoot?

]]> Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:23:22 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114582#p114582 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114581#p114581 Well it is a versatile craft with various weapons loadouts and applications. It has seen use as civilian aerial hotrod, local militia or Police force aircraft to name but a few. Personally as far as First Strike is concerned I'd see this as a lighter armoured and armed variant of the Airspeeder which would handle in a similar fashion to that craft. As it is a two man craft I'd say give the pilot a pair of forward firing fixed light blasters, and give the co-pilot/gunner control of the larger laser weapon mounted under the belly and give it limited rotation and elevation, and possibly some light bombing capability, like cluster bombs or something, but I think that would most likely make it too powerful. The light blasters for infantry and heavier laser cannon for ground vehicles and larger air units should prove sufficient in my opinion.

As for how we utilise this lovely craft? You'll just have to wait and see.

cool

]]> Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:11:34 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114581#p114581 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114572#p114572 I'd see it more as an anti womprat platform, with possible transport applications.

]]> Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:16:20 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114572#p114572 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114558#p114558 A copilot seat with access to a cannon like on the lambda, that would be scary for ground troops.

]]> Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:33:09 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114558#p114558 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114551#p114551 My vision for the T-16 would put it in a close air support role for infantry, primarily as an anti-infantry platform.  This may not be the case in the release version so you'll have to wait and see, but I think it should be pretty close.

]]> Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:27:46 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114551#p114551 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114421#p114421 Well what her role will be is how its utilized.

]]> Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:29:18 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114421#p114421 <![CDATA[Re: Echo Base, T-16's and Stress Testing!]]> https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114373#p114373 How it'll handle&#8800;How it'll be utilized wink .

]]> Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:46:20 +0000 https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=114373#p114373