<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[First Strike Forums — AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?id=9048</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.fsmod.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=9048&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in AT-PT implemented, but....]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.5</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125735#p125735</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It needs to fire manhacks. Or I will cry.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Safe-Keeper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125735#p125735</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125725#p125725</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>BLOOOOOOOOO</p><p>It must be done, the T-10 is lonely.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (TY2D2)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125725#p125725</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125722#p125722</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Thomas12255 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I think we should make it green so it&#039;s easier to know what vehicle is coming after you.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;d love to say let&#039;s make everything green Imperial and red Rebel... but if we go by what we know and break it down... the PT should have red bolts like the ST and the AT.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (TK-1129)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125722#p125722</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125721#p125721</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think we should make it green so it&#039;s easier to know what vehicle is coming after you.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Thomas12255)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125721#p125721</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125720#p125720</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>RSF Angel wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>AFAIK laser cannons (larger starfighter/starship weapons) are colour coded green for imps, red for rebs where as blasters/blaster cannons are just red(E11, speederbike cannon, AT-ST guns, pew pew pew.)</p><p>Although by that reckoning AT-AT&#039;s would have to have had blaster cannons.</p></blockquote></div><p>The above quote is correct. This is the breakdown:</p><br /><p>AT-AT: <br />&nbsp; &nbsp; * 2 heavy laser cannons<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; * 2 medium laser cannons </p><p>AT-ST:<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; * 1 turret light blaster cannon (port side)<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; * 1 anti-personnel concussion-grenade launcher (starboard side)<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; * 1 medium twin blaster cannon (chin) </p><p>AT-PT:<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; * light twin blaster cannon (chin)<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; * concussion-grenade launcher (chin) </p><p>I think what we have a mis-identification of the guns on the AT-AT. I think references should have called them, &quot;Heavy Blaster Cannons&quot;. Though the firepower from the main guns that hit the generator on Hoth resembled a Turbolaser and can thus be called, &quot;Laser Cannons&quot;. But if they were Turbolasers they should be green as are the Star Destroyer guns.</p><p>Although called &quot;Laser Cannons&quot; on the AT-AT... let&#039;s assume they&#039;re &quot;Blaster Cannons&quot;. If that&#039;s the case, the AT, ST, and PT all have Blaster Cannons and should all be red.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (TK-1129)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125720#p125720</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125717#p125717</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I vote for grren if only because its more interesting than red, red, red everywhere. <img src="https://forums.fsmod.com/img/smilies/lol.png" width="15" height="15" alt="lol" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125717#p125717</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125716#p125716</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>nekosaur wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>The RS series does score fairly low on the canon-meter around here (and in general), but all footage of our AT-PT has been work in progress, which means that nothing as of yet is set in stone. We will take your suggestion into consideration.</p></blockquote></div><p>Thank you, sir. <img src="https://forums.fsmod.com/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Lantis)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125716#p125716</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125714#p125714</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>AFAIK laser cannons (larger starfighter/starship weapons) are colour coded green for imps, red for rebs where as blasters/blaster cannons are just red(E11, speederbike cannon, AT-ST guns, pew pew pew.)</p><p>Although by that reckoning AT-AT&#039;s would have to have had blaster cannons.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (RSF Angel)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125714#p125714</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125713#p125713</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ll research the PT when I get home from work... see if there&#039;s any references to the laser color. Video games are usually bad references. Look at Star Wars Galaxies with all their Jedi. <img src="https://forums.fsmod.com/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /> Those games are rarely accurate. </p><p>I&#039;ll see if I can find something for you guys (I have just about every possible Star Wars reference book here at home).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (TK-1129)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125713#p125713</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125712#p125712</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>And neither do any of the TIE variants. But laser colors is a hot topic. While a very general rule seems to be that Rebels use red and Imperials use green, there are plenty of discrepancies on both sides. Like Safe mentioned AT-ST and -AT walkers have red lasers. And the wookiee bowcaster shoots green. </p><p>The RS series does score fairly low on the canon-meter around here (and in general), but all footage of our AT-PT has been work in progress, which means that nothing as of yet is set in stone. We will take your suggestion into consideration.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (nekosaur)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125712#p125712</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125711#p125711</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Super Star Destroyers don&#039;t though, you see?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Thomas12255)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125711#p125711</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125710#p125710</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hard to say, really. The AT-ST has red lasers, as do AT-ATs.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Safe-Keeper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125710#p125710</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125708#p125708</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>But I think that the green lasers would still be more appropriate.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Slyfox_Elite)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125708#p125708</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125707#p125707</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey there, Lantis, welcome aboard.</p><p>I&#039;m not a dev, but people here generally view the RS series as a very inaccurate series, so they don&#039;t pay any heed to it <img src="https://forums.fsmod.com/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /> .</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Safe-Keeper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125707#p125707</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AT-PT implemented, but...]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125705#p125705</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, I am very excited about that the AT-PT will be implemented in a future release of FS but I have one possible &quot;error&quot; in your AT-PT model.</p><p>As you know, the &quot;original&quot; AT-PT&#039;s in Star Wars: Rogue Squadron 1 have green laser bolts, not red. I hope you all understand my criticism and change the laser bolts to green before you release a new version of FS.</p><p>Thank you for reading this. <img src="https://forums.fsmod.com/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Lantis)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125705#p125705</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
