Re: S-Foils?

Talon1579 wrote:

Even if it's not on the record, RS was made by Lucas Arts...

So was the X-Wing series, and the S-Foils didn't make you go faster in that.

But it did in RS... so it comes down to the mod wink

http://www.usfbf1942.com/forums/image.php?u=158&dateline=2006

Re: S-Foils?

If s-foils have some bearing on agility or speed, then yes, have them manual. Otherwise, make them automatic like the landing gear. The effect should be greater in atmosphere than in space. In fact, I don't see a reason why it should have much effect in space at all.

Maybe it would be possible just to simplify the S-Foil concept and tie an animation of them closing to the 'sprint' (shift) key.  You hit sprint in an X-Wing and your S-foils close, the lasers are disabled and you get a speed boost.

I never liked that in RS. In order to go faster, you for some reason had to close your s-foils - in the middle of battle. Not even while in the trench did they close their s-foils. They obviously have nothing to do with speed.

As for ships not being able to fire their weapon systems while s-foils are closed… there hasn’t been any real official material that confirms this. It’s illogical that this would truly be the case as the weapon systems would have to be armed first and opening the s-foils only increases the firing radius for the cannons. Even if it’s true, the craft could be modified to fire when s-foils are closed.

Seeing that s-foils are only open during combat, it'd make sense that weapons were also set to safety when the s-foils were closed.

Modifying them to fire with s-foils closed makes about as much sense as modifying an F-16 so it could fire with weapons set to safety.

Even if it's not on the record, RS was made by Lucas Arts...

No, it was published by LucasArts. It was made by a bunch of people who'd not bothered to do a minute of SW research.

Just that LA developed or published something, doesn't mean it's accurate. Heck, EaW was published by LA, for crying out loud.

"One of the bitches actually gave birth while she was attacking, and her puppies joined in on the carnage."
--the awesomeness that is Boatmurdered.

Re: S-Foils?

It makes sense that the S-foils open up to allow for a better cooling of the cannons, since blasters produce alot of heat, they might have not been able to fire with S-Foils closed.

Wookiepedia says the ability to do so is an upgrade in a later version.

http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/3854/xwingsunev9.gif

Re: S-Foils?

well your all missing the importance of storage aswell were not just talking about the x-wings here wink, B-wings have to fold up 1: because its kinda hard to stand a B-wing on its wing 2: some hangers coldent fit B-wings inside thier hangers because of hight 3: easy for the pilot to enter the B-wing while its on its side 4: Also why the gyroscopic cokpit was made because they had to land on its side so pilots could get in at a 90 degree angle insted of having it stationary and a pain for those trying to get in. those are my points smile

and yes increased maneuverability and cooling were also features of opening the S-foils

http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/3406/fs3wokbannercopypr9.jpg

Re: S-Foils?

Safe-Keeper wrote:

As for ships not being able to fire their weapon systems while s-foils are closed… there hasn’t been any real official material that confirms this. It’s illogical that this would truly be the case as the weapon systems would have to be armed first and opening the s-foils only increases the firing radius for the cannons. Even if it’s true, the craft could be modified to fire when s-foils are closed.

Seeing that s-foils are only open during combat, it'd make sense that weapons were also set to safety when the s-foils were closed.

Modifying them to fire with s-foils closed makes about as much sense as modifying an F-16 so it could fire with weapons set to safety.

Yes. That's why I think that it's not canon. A starfighter's weapons system have to be armed before being able to fire. Like an F-16, 15, 22 or any other real military plane. I was saying IF it is canon, but I've never heard any definitive confirmation. It's not logical, though. Setting the S-foils in attack position still requires the pilot to arm weapons system.

Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.

Re: S-Foils?

Safe-Keeper wrote:

Even if it's not on the record, RS was made by Lucas Arts...

No, it was published by LucasArts. It was made by a bunch of people who'd not bothered to do a minute of SW research.

Just that LA developed or published something, doesn't mean it's accurate. Heck, EaW was published by LA, for crying out loud.

So true, my friend. So true. wink It's really a shame LucasArts doesn't dev their own titles anymore. Or at the very least make sure Star Wars canonity is in check. Same with LFL. hmm

Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.

Re: S-Foils?

FSDev| Dutch_Razor wrote:

It makes sense that the S-foils open up to allow for a better cooling of the cannons, since blasters produce alot of heat, they might have not been able to fire with S-Foils closed.

Wookiepedia says the ability to do so is an upgrade in a later version.

Actually, craft are equiped with cooling systems that keep weapon functions in check as well as other sub systems, like engines. Granted, some work better than others. Opening the s-foils wasn't designed to directly affect weapon cooling as it doesn't really need it.

Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.