Re: Habeus Corpus - rip

First of all, I didn't say that they did not go into the cave because it was dark, it was because it was night. Second, please show your story from a (please take no offense) credible source.

http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/5668/zulucentersignature1hu.gif

Re: Habeus Corpus - rip

Yes, you said it was night. Doesnt change how rediculous your story is. Whether its night or day ...caves are still dark.

1st source i found telling of US and Pakistan secretly airlifting 5000 taliban fighters out of the city of Kunduz , afganistan ..into Pakistan : http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/cont … andonnorth

note: it was a Pakistani General who wired 100k to Muhamed Atta the day of 9/11.

This is just 1 example of the thousands of reports and info that the general citizen hardly ever hears about ..... another notable example is that 3 buildings collapsed on 9/11  towers 1 , 2  AND 7 (which 5 years later, you still didnt know about....because most of your mainsteam media is highly controlled and censored... to find out the truth you have to go out and look for it, not expect to be spoon fed it by tainted corporations......unfortunately the majority of people do rely on being spoon fed sad )

"Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavours to live at the expense of everybody else."
Frédéric Bastiat

Re: Habeus Corpus - rip

FSDev| Bandu wrote:
ArcAngel227 wrote:

"They where SCARED to see a sudden INCREDIBLE threat, pop out of no where"

The above quote deserves to be put in bold. The US got countless warnings (from over 14 countries) of iminent attacks of hijacked airliners being used as missiles and flown into promenant US buildings in advance of 9/11. We (Britain) even warned you a week or so before it happened.

I suggest you do some reading up on the time around 9/11.

You misunderstood me (or I didn't write very well). I didn't mean a NEW threat. As in, OMG where teh smurf did they come from?
I meant a new sudden and painfully apparent vunerability. We've been the target of terror attacks for years. Its not like we didn't know they where out there. ANd its not like those attacks weren't terrible. But Americans weren't fearing for their lives, though they well should have been. People didn't taket eh terrorists seriously. Worse, everytime we where hit, the goverment just didn't react! They knew how dangerous it would be to enrage muslims with a real response, so they simpley didn't respond. So we where hit again, and again and again. Finally, on 9/11 after teh insane amount of deaths the goverments lightbulb finally went off. Ignoring the problem isn't working. Time to treat it like the threat to national security it really is, and not as a criminal act. 

ArcAngel227 wrote:

The VAST majority of Americans do. After 9/11 every American knew that, and had those scenes running through their minds. That number has not decreased.
Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, and liberals, and anyone who dosn't litterly take the terrorists side (pretty much just that 'Al Quaeda in America' Guy from california, or that American guy in afhganistan we found) is still 100% behind the war on terror.
Their just tired of the war in Iraq. We are all. Iraq has america split. But not the war on terror. If we withdraw from Iraq tommorow, the war will continue, and we will fight it just as hard.

I find the bold part of your quote to be a very telling sign that you are unknowingly doctrinated. You just insinuated that any1 who isnt behind this 'War of Terror' is a terrorist!!. "Your either with us, or your with the terrorists" who said that? .... no it wasnt Anakin wink .  More and more people are seeing thro the cover up and lies of 9/11 and therefore the 'War on Terror' . So yes. The number HAS decreased.

Iraq has America split but not the 'war of terror' ? Hang on......wasnt/isnt the Iraqi war part of the 'War of Terror' ??? or atleast supposed to be? . Hmmmm......

Uh...No. Perhaps this is another case of my crappy writing style, but if you'd reread the quote, I think you might see what I was trying to say. I was saying that EVERY American, every single one of them, supports the war on terror. The only exception to that are the VERY few who actively take teh terrorists side physically. By actually either sending them money or arms, or fighting for them. The total inverse of 'You just insinuated that any1 who isnt behind this 'War of Terror' is a terrorist!!'. Americans DIFFER, sometimes widley so, on the way we should fight the terrorists, and the largest difference (obviously) is Iraq. There are no americans, that aren't outright traitors, who want the terrorists to kill more americans.

As for 'closing the border' on pakistan...Its a very nice idea. I like it alot. Its a shame it couldn't be done. But the huge expanse of the border, in addition to the incredibley mountainous terrian (teaming with tunnels), and the nomadic people that go across the border the border everyday, make that practically an impossible feat. So you are right, I guess Afhganistan wasn't exactly picture perfect...letting the big fish get away is sorta a large mark against it, but besides that (large) detail, Afhganistan was the right move, and was carried out very well.

And now for the airlift thingy. I'll certaintly look into that online...but for convience sake, would you happen to have a link from a slightly more reputable source than 'cooperative reaserch'? Like a news site...?

http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c387/ArcAngel227/FirstStrike.jpg
Futurama: You Can't Prove it Won't Happen

Re: Habeus Corpus - rip

"I was saying that EVERY American, every single one of them, supports the war on terror. The only exception to that are the VERY few who actively take teh terrorists side physically"

(still looks like your saying that if you dont believe in the 'WoT' then your part of the terrorist network lol )

Anyway........

No. Thats a misinformed generalization (at best) or a lie ( at worst) . Not every single American is behind this 'War on terror' .Absolutely not. Same goes for Britain. 50% of New Yorkers believe the US Government engineered or partly engineered, by letting it happen, 9/11.  9/11 and this 'War on Terror' go hand in hand. Believe in 1 ...believe in the other .... know its a fraud and you dont believe in THIS 'War on terror' .
Believe me, Im not anti-war or a pacifist. If we were getting attacked by real terrorists and not Government sponsored terrorism then I WOULD be for a war. Fortunatly for me, I can see thro it all.





The site is perfectly legitamate. Just because it doesnt say 'FOX' or 'O'Reilly says....' doesnt mean its fake. There will be fake sites out there ..dont get me wrong.. but these reports are a timeline of events since 9/11 ....made up of news reports including mainstream.


[Independent, 11/16/2001; New York Times, 11/24/2001; BBC, 11/26/2001; Independent, 11/26/2001; Guardian, 11/27/2001; MSNBC, 11/29/2001] all these reported on the airlift. It says in the page i linked to.

I remember seeing it on the BBC news ages ago.

"Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavours to live at the expense of everybody else."
Frédéric Bastiat

82

Re: Habeus Corpus - rip

Hey , if its been reported on by BBC news then it must be true! lol

Re: Habeus Corpus - rip

FSDev| Bandu wrote:

No. Thats a misinformed generalization (at best) or a lie ( at worst) . Not every single American is behind this 'War on terror' .Absolutely not. Same goes for Britain. 50% of New Yorkers believe the US Government engineered or partly engineered, by letting it happen, 9/11.

I highly highly highly highly highly highly doubt that.

http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c387/ArcAngel227/FirstStrike.jpg
Futurama: You Can't Prove it Won't Happen

Re: Habeus Corpus - rip

One word Illuminati smile

In the end I trust no one but me, so who's got your back?

http://www.fsmod.com/stats/fssig.php?player=FS_BLITZ
Someone tell Bandu Ron Paul won't win!