• TK8177
  • TK8177
  • Scout Trooper
  • Offline
  • From: Italy
  • Registered: 2006-01-05
  • Posts: 59

Re: Implement the AT-PT please! :)

it's obsolete big_smile

www.501italica.com

TK8177's Website

  • Registered: 2006-05-15
  • Posts: 728

Re: Implement the AT-PT please! :)

If its going to have a concussion grenade launche, it should be very weak - 1 rocket should set it on fire - maybe two to the front.

--------------------------------------
If I should die, think only this of me:
That in some corner of a foreign field
There lies a plagiarist.

24 Reply by BanthaPodo (edited by BanthaPodo 2006-12-16 20:13:22)

  • Registered: 2006-12-05
  • Posts: 8

Re: Implement the AT-PT please! :)

I don't care if it's ugly as long as it's a mean machine! \m/

  • Registered: 2006-12-16
  • Posts: 12

Re: Implement the AT-PT please! :)

I’m sure the first strike team has the skill to make this ugly hunk of metal look nice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
''I disapprove of your using this rude tone of voice to me in front of a junior.''
  • Registered: 2006-12-14
  • Posts: 3

Re: Implement the AT-PT please! :)

But don't make too many vehicles, so the weak, "underpowered" ones just will be standing unused in the mainbase. And don't make the AT-RT so fast, agile and weak so people would just bail them. How to balance this is up to you big_smile

  • From: NY, USA
  • Registered: 2006-01-27
  • Posts: 324

Re: Implement the AT-PT please! :)

o.o
     AT-RT ftw!
looks sweet

http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/2/proton8.png
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/5964/final1pq0.jpg

Proton8's Website

28 Reply by Safe-Keeper (edited by Safe-Keeper 2007-02-02 18:58:32)

  • From: Grong, Norway
  • Registered: 2006-07-25
  • Posts: 5,192

Re: Implement the AT-PT please! :)

They weren't, but apparantly all three Rogue Squadron games featured them.

Using the Rogue Squadron series as a Star Wars source is like consulting Däniken's rantings when questions on UFOs arise.

I'd be alright with it if we were able to take a few liberties with the design

No, I say keep it accurate. It's not the least bit ugly to me. And what matters is the functionality.

AT-PT is ugly, very ugly

Well, I'm sure there are people who don't find you very pretty either [/politically correct nanny tongue ]

But don't make too many vehicles, so the weak, "underpowered" ones just will be standing unused in the mainbase.

How many vehicles are made is not relevant, what's relevant is how they're distributed among the maps. The mod can have 70 vehicles and still give us maps with hardly vehicles at all (cough, Judicator, cough).

"One of the bitches actually gave birth while she was attacking, and her puppies joined in on the carnage."
--the awesomeness that is Boatmurdered.

Safe-Keeper's Website