36 (edited by Emperor Norton I 2007-11-19 21:14:41)

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Canadiens1160 wrote:

I was always confused with hyperdrive.  So basically, hyperdrive is the same constant speed no matter what, and the determining factor for long-distance journeys is how long it takes for the nav-computer to compute a route to your destination?

I believe so from all the Star Wars documentaries I've seen and books I've looked through.

generalrievous wrote:

I thought all the treky ships run on warpdrives..

They do, yes. Warp drive is based on speed and numbers times the speed of light.

http://forums.filefront.com/gallery/images/149556/2_Beat.jpeg
http://forums.filefront.com/gallery/images/149556/1_lenni5.jpeg
http://forums.filefront.com/gallery/images/149556/1_cash.jpeg
http://forums.filefront.com/gallery/images/149556/1_Vietnam.jpeg

37 (edited by FSDev| TALON 2007-11-20 07:45:20)

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Canadiens1160 wrote:

I was always confused with hyperdrive.  So basically, hyperdrive is the same constant speed no matter what, and the determining factor for long-distance journeys is how long it takes for the nav-computer to compute a route to your destination?

A Hyperdrive opens a rift in space and allows a ship to travel in Hyperspace, another dimension where great distances can be travelled in a fraction of the time. Everything in real space has a hyperspace shadow counterpart, this is how Interdictor cruisers pull ships out of hyperspace, they project a gravity well in the path of a ship travelling through hyperspace, the ship's navigational computer then shuts down and automatically drops the ship out of hyperspace, an emergency measure as a collision with the shadow of a planetary body in hyperspace would be just as lethal as colliding with a planet in real space.

Ships can have different grades of Hyperdrive with different levels of efficency which can effect the length of time it takes to travel somewhere. Another factor is the route you take. If you use a safe well charted, well travelled route you'll most likely take longer to get there than a space pirate who may have access to the charts for more dangerous less travelled routes that require more risk but can get you there sometimes in much less time.

Anyhow getting back to the topic of this thread I don't think one really beats the other as they are very different, plus one happens far in the future and one happens in the distant past, so it's a moot point really as they'd never meet. Still does give some of the folks on Youtube the excuse to create some cool looking battles.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v600/TALON_TAW/TALONSIGNEWB-1.jpg
http://stats.fsmod.com/fssig.php?player=Talon-UK
http://stats.fsmod.com/sig/pilot.Talon-UK.png

38 (edited by Lance Haith 2007-11-20 02:14:51)

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Well to sum it all up Trekwars is like DC and Marvel mixing it up. Its fun but disaterous for both sides.

Disasterous because even if the Empire invaded and won over the Milky Way it would not be powerful enough to hold every star system and every colony in check. I mean there is a reason the empire folded like a pancake after RotJ... and that only 25 Star Destroyers and 1 Super Star Destroyer participated in the battle of Endor. The empire rules on a doctrine of fear and pacification... over time they would be stretched too thin in both the milkyway and their own galaxy that they could eventually collapse or lose significant power.

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Lance Haith wrote:

I mean there is a reason the empire folded like a pancake after RotJ...

Who folds pancakes?

_________________________________________________
a.k.a.:  Grandma Tarkin  //  hQ.Terrorek

Today's spelling/grammar tip: There = a (sometimes conceptual) place. "There is my car." or "There is such a thing as magic."  // Their = posessive. "Their meat is full of worms." // They're = contraction of <they are>. "They're crazy!" // "They're trying to put their shoes up there."

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Emperor Norton I wrote:

Lasers are weaker than phasers in Star Trek physics. Hyper Drive in Star Wars is also based on guidance, not actual speed, where actual speed is the basis in Trek.

And the Borg are probably as big as any Imperial ship, have droves of unending forces and have a fleet probably larger than the empire.

Borg ships are smaller than star destroyer, especially executor class and lets not forget the eclipse, death star etc. And sw hper drive is better than st warp.

First strike, playing from day one: SirKillsalot30

Resident Metal Gear Solid fan

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Lance Haith wrote:

Well to sum it all up Trekwars is like DC and Marvel mixing it up. Its fun but disaterous for both sides.

Disasterous because even if the Empire invaded and won over the Milky Way it would not be powerful enough to hold every star system and every colony in check. I mean there is a reason the empire folded like a pancake after RotJ... and that only 25 Star Destroyers and 1 Super Star Destroyer participated in the battle of Endor. The empire rules on a doctrine of fear and pacification... over time they would be stretched too thin in both the milkyway and their own galaxy that they could eventually collapse or lose significant power.

No empire will ever last inedfinetly (with the exeption of EA and TESCO)

First strike, playing from day one: SirKillsalot30

Resident Metal Gear Solid fan

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Emperor Norton I wrote:

Lasers are weaker than phasers in Star Trek physics. Hyper Drive in Star Wars is also based on guidance, not actual speed, where actual speed is the basis in Trek.

And the Borg are probably as big as any Imperial ship, have droves of unending forces and have a fleet probably larger than the empire.

read the figures. the borg can be destroyed by the federation if a lot of ships attack it. one star destroyer is like 1 billion times stronger then the enterprise. The federation, borg and every other civilisation combined would not be able to win against the empire. Of course forgetting about those hamsters like being that don't help anybody and are more likely to attack the federation.

But this is really for the empire against federation and the empire would win. But none of it matters because all the figures are made up. I could make up a race in my head that could destroy both of them in a second.

http://www.fsmod.com/stats/fssig.php?player=btcc
Occupation: Hacker on steroids

INGAME NAME: btcc