• From: Waterford, Ireland :)
  • Registered: 2007-07-18
  • Posts: 2,064

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

<RT> Jimwalker-NL wrote:
Stardestroyersarecool wrote:

Have you guys looked at how the at-at walks in star wars battlefront? I think it looks pretty good.

HE mentoined Battlefront. <Pulls out the Stun Baton.>

But seriously. It's mostly the BF2142 engine the Dev's are having problems with. They know how the walker should walk.

Battlefront is a good game, but I hate battlefront 2

First strike, playing from day one: SirKillsalot30

Resident Metal Gear Solid fan
  • TY2D2
  • TY2D2
  • First Strike Team Member
  • Offline
  • From: California
  • Registered: 2006-07-24
  • Posts: 4,574

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

I wouldn't say that again, your gunna get sliced and diced by a lightsaber tongue

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a202/ty2d2/fsprsig2.gif
"Munchkin: One who, on being told that this is a game about politics and intrigue in 17th century Italy, asks to play a ninja."
— Andrew Rilstone

TY2D2's Website

  • From: Grong, Norway
  • Registered: 2006-07-25
  • Posts: 5,192

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

Battlefront was a great game if you didn't mind the thousand inconsistencies and liked an arcade approach. As such, it was similar to RS.

And to be honest, I didn't really like BF, and definitely didn't like BF2.

"One of the bitches actually gave birth while she was attacking, and her puppies joined in on the carnage."
--the awesomeness that is Boatmurdered.

Safe-Keeper's Website

  • From: Waterford, Ireland :)
  • Registered: 2007-07-18
  • Posts: 2,064

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

I liked battlefront because its was the first game I played where it was star wars in a battlefield setting.

First strike, playing from day one: SirKillsalot30

Resident Metal Gear Solid fan

47 Reply by F22Gaiden (edited by F22Gaiden 2007-08-21 01:18:35)

  • Registered: 2007-07-08
  • Posts: 9

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

Ok Ok... obviously the AT-AT walks... I just have one question... Snow speeders. Will they have the tow cable to bring down General Viers' gigantic walker? Oh and on the question of will it tilt on hills and stuff. I believe it should be able to go through some hills on the account that AT-AT means - All-Terrain-Armored-Transport. In my opinion, anything a quad can get over, the AT-AT should be able to get over. Am I wrong to compare the AT-AT to a quad? I mean it seems right to me. Ok, I got my 2 cents in... let the Gaiden bashing begin.

48 Reply by BlasterFreak (edited by BlasterFreak 2007-08-21 05:38:11)

  • From: Netherlands
  • Registered: 2006-12-27
  • Posts: 342

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

Safe-Keeper wrote:

Battlefront was a great game if you didn't mind the thousand inconsistencies and liked an arcade approach. As such, it was similar to RS.

And to be honest, I didn't really like BF, and definitely didn't like BF2.

Battlefront soon put me of because of its major lag, it was a nice little game. But not fun enough, just my opinion.

http://i.imgur.com/pkJ0Ygm.png

BlasterFreak's Website

  • From: Grong, Norway
  • Registered: 2006-07-25
  • Posts: 5,192

Re: Realistic AT-AT and AT-ST walking

By no means, Gaiden, it'd be interesting was if AT-ATs really were all-terrain. Actually, it'd be awesome if they could just go straight through trees if they were on a map with woods, because I imagine they'd just cut them down, like tanks run down trees in real life.

"One of the bitches actually gave birth while she was attacking, and her puppies joined in on the carnage."
--the awesomeness that is Boatmurdered.

Safe-Keeper's Website