First Strike Forums — atpt

Re: atpt

null@example.com (Imperial) — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:46:00 +0000

*quietly sweeps topic under the rug*

Nothing to see here!

Re: atpt

null@example.com (FSDev| General Un-Co) — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:33:38 +0000

I see your and raise you

Re: atpt

null@example.com (krenyo) — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:51:07 +0000

im just gonna go ahead and hmmmmmmm some more

Re: atpt

null@example.com (Stardestroyersarecool) — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:09:13 +0000

I believe the mod features page used to state the at-pt would be included at some point, I brought this up before aswell http://forums.fsmod.com/viewtopic.php?id=7018

Re: atpt

null@example.com (Pam) — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:03:26 +0000

Welcome Yeti,

how would you like the ATPT in addition to the tanks?

krenyo wrote:

hmmm indeed

(he has this look on his face as if he knew more)

Re: atpt

null@example.com (RSF Angel) — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:27:39 +0000

@ Devs: Be nice.
@Myn0ck:
While I agree with the devs regarding the firepower of this thing ( i'm thinking the blaster on a ME Speeder would be loads if not excessive) I agree with you regarding its speed.
If one is ever implimented in the game I hope its as fast, if not faster than the 2142 walkers when they run- because that clone wars episode showed them racing at a blistering speed.

A squad of 6 ATPT's would look amazing running across desert or wasteland- closing the distance.

I'd like them to be easier to kill than a Me speeder too- 1 or 2 rocket hits. That way, they could replace the ATST at mosespa with 2 or 3 apiece and covering the ground between the landing site and the city would be more fun for both sides.
(I'd like to be gunning at them as much as i would like to be driving one into a rain of fire)

I'd also hope the ATST's get to run at some point, though not quite as swiftly, or gracefully.

Re: atpt

null@example.com (krenyo) — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:30:56 +0000

hmmm indeed

Re: atpt

null@example.com (FSDev| JayBiggS) — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:34:18 +0000

ATPT hmmmm

Re: atpt

null@example.com (FSDev| RedMonkey999) — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:19:41 +0000

What Talon said +

Re: atpt

null@example.com (FSDev| TALON) — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:25:13 +0000

First off welcome to the forums Myn0ck, hope you enjoy your time here.

I think you have a bit of a skewed view of what this vehicle is and its size or something, but it would certainly have nowhere near the same firepower as a Rebel T1-B tank.

This is more like a very light anti-infantry vehicle, practically an extended suit of exo armor for a lone Stormtrooper. If we were to ever introduce this vehicle, it wouldn't have anywhere near the kind of weapons loadout you're suggesting here.

The Firehawke is more than a match for the T1-B, the balance is just a little out of whack at the moment, but will soon be rectified.

atpt

null@example.com (myn0ck) — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:53:07 +0000

http://www.theforce.net/SWTC/Pix/books/egvv/atpt2.gif
Add the ATPT instead of an imperial tank
give it the same velocity and mount the same cannons as an alliance t
ank.

Myn0ck