• zanth91
  • zanth91
  • FirstStrike Tester
  • Offline
  • From: Houston, TX
  • Registered: 2006-02-04
  • Posts: 590

Topic: AT-AT (NEW)

How close will the AT-AT look to this? (great animation)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … &hl=en

http://www.usfbf1942.com/forums/image.php?u=158&dateline=2006
  • From: Canada
  • Registered: 2006-08-27
  • Posts: 1,781

Re: AT-AT (NEW)

zanth91 wrote:

How close will the AT-AT look to this? (great animation)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … &hl=en

Exactly like it

  • From: Boca Raton Florida, US
  • Registered: 2006-01-05
  • Posts: 1,118

Re: AT-AT (NEW)

/me cheers big_smile

http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c387/ArcAngel227/FirstStrike.jpg
Futurama: You Can't Prove it Won't Happen
  • From: Seattle, Washington
  • Registered: 2006-01-06
  • Posts: 1,994

Re: AT-AT (NEW)

hahaha...

I like your question zanth, very clear without being excessively vague wink

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/RidgeRebel999/Star%20Wars%20Pics/RedMonkey999-TrialSig.jpg

FSDev| RedMonkey999's Website

  • Registered: 2006-11-06
  • Posts: 95

Re: AT-AT (NEW)

i cant see it now b/c they got that stuff blocked off on most school computers [we know how to get by that though]

  • Registered: 2006-07-24
  • Posts: 343

Re: AT-AT (NEW)

That animation seems to leave out the "all singing" and "all dancing" nature of the AT-AT though sad

Fear the Woodzilla

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y283/Tortel/Woodrow-1.jpg

FSDev| Woodrow's Website

  • Registered: 2006-07-13
  • Posts: 34

Re: AT-AT (NEW)

wow, those sounds are.....very inaccurate.