• Registered: 2006-09-16
  • Posts: 181

Re: Falcon Pods?

It doesn't sounds fair to lose points for your vehicle <.<

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v492/Tollaris/Maximilian.png
  • TY2D2
  • TY2D2
  • First Strike Team Member
  • Offline
  • From: California
  • Registered: 2006-07-24
  • Posts: 4,574

Re: Falcon Pods?

It is absolutely fair... And it will prevent people from charging their ATSTs into the middle of a million rebels to get owned.

Ever heard of you break it you buy it? Well same principle.

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a202/ty2d2/fsprsig2.gif
"Munchkin: One who, on being told that this is a game about politics and intrigue in 17th century Italy, asks to play a ninja."
— Andrew Rilstone

TY2D2's Website

  • zanth91
  • zanth91
  • FirstStrike Tester
  • Offline
  • From: Houston, TX
  • Registered: 2006-02-04
  • Posts: 590

Re: Falcon Pods?

So basically you can destroy empty enemy vehicles and get points... nah

BTW TY. in GC, you could walk though the falcon even if it wasn't static. That shouldn't be taken away.

http://www.usfbf1942.com/forums/image.php?u=158&amp;dateline=2006

25 Reply by Safe-Keeper (edited by Safe-Keeper 2007-04-08 16:29:57)

  • From: Grong, Norway
  • Registered: 2006-07-25
  • Posts: 5,192

Re: Falcon Pods?

Nobody's talking about empty vehicles. We're talking about manned vehicles, like when you shoot down a TIE fighter on Combat Air Patrol.

Or does it have to include parked ones, too? Not that it'd hurt too much.

"One of the bitches actually gave birth while she was attacking, and her puppies joined in on the carnage."
--the awesomeness that is Boatmurdered.

Safe-Keeper's Website

  • TY2D2
  • TY2D2
  • First Strike Team Member
  • Offline
  • From: California
  • Registered: 2006-07-24
  • Posts: 4,574

Re: Falcon Pods?

Destroying parked vehicles can be countered with Anti-Base-Camping.

I don't know about you but I don't really want people getting spit out the back of the Falcon in the air because the engine can't handle the collion of the players and the vehicle. Its lame. 2 versions would do best. Because all the ones where it isn't used but was present you just use the static version. Then in the ones where it needs to be mobile remove the interior and leave a just a ramp, which would be the exit/entry point for it. People don't need to be walking around in it when someones trying to fly. It gets pilots teamkills when its not thier fault and it looks lame!

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a202/ty2d2/fsprsig2.gif
"Munchkin: One who, on being told that this is a game about politics and intrigue in 17th century Italy, asks to play a ninja."
— Andrew Rilstone

TY2D2's Website

  • zanth91
  • zanth91
  • FirstStrike Tester
  • Offline
  • From: Houston, TX
  • Registered: 2006-02-04
  • Posts: 590

Re: Falcon Pods?

then the falcon is no fun. I loved being able to walk around in it.

http://www.usfbf1942.com/forums/image.php?u=158&amp;dateline=2006
  • TY2D2
  • TY2D2
  • First Strike Team Member
  • Offline
  • From: California
  • Registered: 2006-07-24
  • Posts: 4,574

Re: Falcon Pods?

Do you not understand?
You don't need to walk around in the falcon while its flying, its not fun to see random colors flash on your screen and then get shot out the back of it when the server lags.

A) It's impossible to walk around in during dogfights in the movie and in the film.
B) It would look stupid if people shoot out the back of it while its flying.
C) Having a static version would allow for more details to be put into it and it would look much nicer.

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a202/ty2d2/fsprsig2.gif
"Munchkin: One who, on being told that this is a game about politics and intrigue in 17th century Italy, asks to play a ninja."
— Andrew Rilstone

TY2D2's Website