Ridiculous... There are far lamer things on there than FS. Why would anyone have a problem with FS's wiki.

Jeez, some PEOPLE these days.

"Munchkin: One who, on being told that this is a game about politics and intrigue in 17th century Italy, asks to play a ninja."
— Andrew Rilstone

Am I dreaming, or is the FS article being overwhelmed by 'Delete' votes while... this is deemed notable ? And this?! I almost get the feeling they've taken the notability system of Wikipedia and turned it upside down. Not to mention that their system is entirely unwritten (with statements like 'if you do a search through old discussions, you'll find we actually do have notability rules'), and seems to be largely built around precedence ('this deserves deletion, but there are lots of other articles equally useless that are not deleted, so let this stay' - don't ask me why they bother with First Strike, then, but that's me). Again, one exceptionally strange Wiki .

Anyways, I've copied the article to Notepad and will look into Wikipedia's notability requirements (yes, Wookiepedia, it's possible to have actual agreed-upon notability guidelines in writing) to see if I can move it there, minus the infobox and images, of course, unless you allow me to upload screenshots to Wikipedia under a free license or to the Public Domain. We'll see.