1 (edited by Stardestroyersarecool 2009-06-03 08:56:22)

Topic: The new Battlefield?

Is this going to be a bigger, badder and better than Battlefield? http://gamevideos.1up.com/video/id/24987

If it comes to PC I think so.

First strike, playing from day one: SirKillsalot30

Resident Metal Gear Solid fan

Re: The new Battlefield?

Hmmm, looks pretty good, they'll need some serious net code to minimise lag for 250 players. I'm down to 10FPS with just 64 players.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v600/TALON_TAW/TALONSIGNEWB-1.jpg
http://stats.fsmod.com/fssig.php?player=Talon-UK
http://stats.fsmod.com/sig/pilot.Talon-UK.png

Re: The new Battlefield?

We gots BF BC2 in development. Some stuff for that has been released.

Anyway, Yeah.  I thought MS had "won" flatout, in turns of impressiveness and new ideas on Monday.  Yesterday, I think sony pushed the line even further.  I've been torn between a PS3 and 360 for a while now, I think Sony won me over yesterday.

BlackIntel Game Leader
DUKE815: Teamwork's complicated.  I've found that ramming a Lambda with a Y-wing at full boost is most effective.

Re: The new Battlefield?

Well, 256 Players sounds good, but to be honest:
Most players are to dumb to use the teamplay tools of BF2 and BF 2142 (Squads, VoIP, Comroses). MAG would suffer from the same problems if Sony don't enforce the use of the tools.

The Vid shows what Zipper Interactive has learned from DICEs BF Games, like the Bonuspoints for the squadleader.
It also shows what some weak points of BF have been avoided, like the por immersion in the gameworld (landed Helos as Spawnpoints !) or the IMBA Airforce (seems that in MAG no player can fly, and airstrikes are scrippted like the BF2 Artillerie).

Also interesting would be the way Sony wants to distribute it.
Did you must pay each month a fee to play ?
IMHO the best way to fund a Server capable to host 256 Players.

CYNIC, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. Hence the custom among the Scythians of plucking out a cynic’s eyes to improve his vision
http://www.fsmod.com/stats/fssig.php?player=Al-Rik

Re: The new Battlefield?

Alreech wrote:

256 Players.

I wonder what the 6 is for.
250 was just too round... if i snip off a few lines of code and remove the jetpacks, we can fit another SIX people in! W00T!

http://g5hd7a.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pYKw7Yp4ui_IKxw2wYbMr5xQ7XHAnuSmXBQcR3smbF6G-gHNuMLfh0QmoLRTc58VGEnJ1FheOT0YzDoDBF0603XYCVboCkrCX/rsf%20sig.png
''Its over. Angel won.''   RSF Gurd

6 (edited by FSDev| TALON 2009-06-03 20:01:04)

Re: The new Battlefield?

It is just part of the mighty PC code which all things PC must abide by, as in 16, 32 & 64 player. 16, 32 & 64 bit. 256 colours. 64 x 64, 128 x 128, 256 x 256, 512 x 512 & 1024 x 1024 texture maps.

I tell ya its a conspiracy just like the DaVinci Code.

tongue

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v600/TALON_TAW/TALONSIGNEWB-1.jpg
http://stats.fsmod.com/fssig.php?player=Talon-UK
http://stats.fsmod.com/sig/pilot.Talon-UK.png

Re: The new Battlefield?

RSF Angel wrote:
Alreech wrote:

256 Players.

I wonder what the 6 is for.
250 was just too round... if i snip off a few lines of code and remove the jetpacks, we can fit another SIX people in! W00T!

Must be a power of 2.

http://www.dsgaming.net/imperial/fssig.jpg
http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/co/type/2/dsimperial.png
http://stats.fsmod.com/sig/trooper.Imperial.png