141 (edited by Stardestroyersarecool 2008-04-13 14:07:20)

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Mitthrawnundo wrote:
Stardestroyersarecool wrote:

Hmmm..... well what has everyone in this thread done then?

They've been babbling on about a topic that cannot be compared. According to some people, two shots fired by a TIE fighter can pierce through the Voyager's hull, while others claim that a single phaser can be fired and it can blow up an ISD, or that proton torpedoes are inferior to photon and quantum torpedoes. What the thread comes down to is whether you like Star Trek or Star Wars more.

Sounds like a comparison to me tongue

First strike, playing from day one: SirKillsalot30

Resident Metal Gear Solid fan

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Its more of a personal preference debate.

http://stats.fsmod.com/fssig.php?player=mitthrawnundo

"Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword apparently never met automatic weapons."

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

I like both,if i see star trek re-runs i like it,but star trek and star wars are NOT comparable,its like comparing pizza too ............ a phone?well my point is it DOSN"T WORK(im saying this in a nice way)

http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sh/type/0/gaurd502.png
http://stats.fsmod.com/sig/medic.gurd502.png

144

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

gaurd502 wrote:

I like both,if i see star trek re-runs i like it,but star trek and star wars are NOT comparable,its like comparing pizza too ............ a phone?well my point is it DOSN"T WORK(im saying this in a nice way)

They both say stuff when you dial the red buttons and press hard enough.


big_smile

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a202/ty2d2/fsprsig2.gif
"Munchkin: One who, on being told that this is a game about politics and intrigue in 17th century Italy, asks to play a ninja."
Andrew Rilstone

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

But you can eat one and not the other. tongue

http://stats.fsmod.com/fssig.php?player=Rissien
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c254/ElvishKnight/RissenSiggycopy.jpg

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Safe-Keeper wrote:

I don't know about Star Trek and Star Wars, but Star Trek at least kicks the butt of the Babylon 5, sorry, Babel 13 universe.

u can has proof! big_smile

I beleive the B5 universe would have the greatest chance for success against the empire. Even if it was just the Earth Alliance against them. With the First ones and the league the empire would have no chance.

Given that an Earth Omega class destroyer is almost the same size as an ISD and given the Omega produces less power, 101,408TW in 3 weeks. It's cannons are far superior in terms of power to that of federation ships, with a max output of 11,989TW, 2.8Megaton bomb, aprox 1/2 the strength of a turbo laser. The Omega could also use its jumpoint as a weapon, opening it directly on the ISD, the energy from the jumpoint would tear the ISD ship apart.

The Warlock class destroyers new to Earthforce have 2 railed partical beam cannons, one of which alone is capable of levelling the United kingdom with 1 shot.

IF you were to include the Vorlons, shodows and other firstones into the equation the empire has no chance. The Vorlon planet killer is far smaller and more manourerable than the death star, comprised of an organic hull that learns from combat. This alone could take on the deathstar as it can destroy entire planets too. The shadow death cloud not only can engulf entire planets and destroy them from the inside out, it can swallow whole fleets and hold them there, inside the cloud the ships exteriors will begin to freeze, requiring the ships to draw more power to life support to keep the crew alive. It can also use its missile which burrow into a planets core to destroy the ships inside.

Lets not forget the greatest weapon ever, the shadow battlecrabs beam weapon. It would slice through ISD's like paper. The beam alone is theorised to have been able to turn entire planets into wastelands and slice up smaller planetoids.

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Dude , do you realize the limitations the empire would have that are completely figured out and will be used against them by t5he Federation starships ?
LOL
This is where I see great fun.
To even rolepay a possible confrontation shows who would get rounded up and sent to confinement awaiting trial.
Its apples vs pineapples.

The fact that a federation starship could beam aboard landing parties at various locations within the ship they are attacking takes the fight out of the target pretty fast.
My style would be a little more brutal, as I wouldnt send delegates in person , no ...  I would place a bomb right next to major components like power and cooling systems, or perhaps central life support and pressurization systems.  This taking the fight quickly out of the target as well.

So in a sense, its not only incompatible to compare the two , its very unfair.

"The victorious win the battle, then go out to fight ... while the defeated go out to fight, then try to win the battle.   -SunTzu
"The only difference between a capitalist and a communist is that the communist hates competition!" -Circuit

http://www.coolanddry.net/ceilingcat.png