8 (edited by zanth91 2006-06-04 13:04:43)

Re: 2142

Slave1 wrote:

I refuse to buy 2142 and so do alot of other people if you port say good buy to any chance of a big fan base

Same. EA just wants my money, and not give a quality game. From what I hear, all the ex. packs and booster packs are a bunch of glitchy maps and a few weapons to use. RIP OFF!

http://www.usfbf1942.com/forums/image.php?u=158&dateline=2006

Re: 2142

Slave1 wrote:

I refuse to buy 2142 and so do alot of other people if you port say good buy to any chance of a big fan base

That is just plain inability to look past the past.  Do not judge something that you know nothing about.  Until the game comes out and I hear if it's good or bad, I will not make any refusal to buy it.  A bad past does not always become a bad future.  I still trust that EA will create an enjoyable game that we can all have fun playing together in.  I trust in EA, even though they have not given me any reason to do so in the past.  Why?  Because everyone has a chance.  When the community of players become arrogant, too arrogant to look past their own deluted opinions on a certain company because of past games, then a company will fail.  However, if a community is willing to help the developers by broadcasting their ideas on how to make a good game, then that very game that the people want will become true. 

If you want this game to be made well, and if you want to play a great Battlefield game, then stop bashing EA and take a moment to e-mail them your complaints in a very formal manner.  Tell them how you believe they can improve their game and all other aspects of their company.  Silence will not create an enjoyable experience.

Re: 2142

Well the expansion packs suck, yes. But I am geniunely lookin foward to BF2142. I also think it looks fantastic for mods. Better for walking viechles, better for movable ships and other large moving objects (titan), new gear selection system, intergraded ai (those turrets), probally more control over triggers (judging by those anti titan missles) and muchos moreos. Looks good to me, and I'm sure once it does launch and the mods sink they're teeth into it the bf community won't have much probs adjusting.

http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c387/ArcAngel227/FirstStrike.jpg
Futurama: You Can't Prove it Won't Happen

Re: 2142

wut intergrated ai, those turrets r controled by ppl

http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/os/type/2/proton8.png
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/5964/final1pq0.jpg

Re: 2142

^^^Are you sure? Integrated AI would be great in BF2142, yet I have a strange feeling that it will be another BFVietnam all over again. Though I am still looking forward to it, especially the new titan aspect of it.

http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g276/JAB62290/forum_members.gif

Re: 2142

well, it is an updated BF2-engine, so u can see it as BF: Vietnam 2 style

I gonna buy Quakewars smile

Almost same game with a better engine smile --> Updated DooM III-engine

So I guess Quakewars has a bigger potential than those new BF

http://www.fsmod.com/img/drag_sig.jpg

Re: 2142

Someone always says what I want to say before I get a chance mad

I too think that Quakewars is going to be better than 2142. 2142, at this point, to me, is just a tweaked BF2 engine with ugly vehicles and the gimmick of lots of gadgets.

http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/903/ramsiginquisitionpz4.jpg
Arrgh, yar... arr ar arrgh!