8 Reply by generalandrew (edited by generalandrew 2006-10-31 20:45:28)

  • From: AACC., Maryland
  • Registered: 2006-01-15
  • Posts: 1,009

Re: YT-1300s/Shuttles with interiors?

I strongly agree with actualy having to go into the shuttles to get to the place where you have to press E to get in. Mabye not full fledged interiors (although that'd be neat), but at least a ramp and a small corridor on the larger fly-able shuttles that has to be traversed to get to the cockbit.

Hey, you got your Star Wars in my Star Trek!!
Generalandrew = FS's Offical Band Geek!!
"I'm gonna kick you in the balls through TCP/IP!!!" - Andrew_Kirk_25
<SpecterWolf>    That's ok.. I blew him as well as a few of his buddies up that ditched an apc.. Explosions ftw!

generalandrew's Website

  • Holmes
  • Shock Trooper
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2006-05-27
  • Posts: 98

Re: YT-1300s/Shuttles with interiors?

generalandrew wrote:

I strongly agree with actualy having to go into the shuttles to get to the place where you have to press E to get in. Mabye not full fledged interiors (although that'd be neat), but at least a ramp and a small corridor on the larger fly-able shuttles that has to be traversed to get to the cockbit.

It would actually take less lag to make just interiors without slots for sitting, compared to actual slots made for sitting, wouldn't it?

  • From: AACC., Maryland
  • Registered: 2006-01-15
  • Posts: 1,009

Re: YT-1300s/Shuttles with interiors?

I don't know. Although Galactic Conquest used a different engine, I don't think it could be changed THAT much. But I don't know enough to make an answer to that, so any coders/developers want to answer?

Hey, you got your Star Wars in my Star Trek!!
Generalandrew = FS's Offical Band Geek!!
"I'm gonna kick you in the balls through TCP/IP!!!" - Andrew_Kirk_25
<SpecterWolf>    That's ok.. I blew him as well as a few of his buddies up that ditched an apc.. Explosions ftw!

generalandrew's Website

  • Registered: 2006-05-15
  • Posts: 728

Re: YT-1300s/Shuttles with interiors?

generalandrew wrote:

I strongly agree with actualy having to go into the shuttles to get to the place where you have to press E to get in. Mabye not full fledged interiors (although that'd be neat), but at least a ramp and a small corridor on the larger fly-able shuttles that has to be traversed to get to the cockpit.

I like that. Shouldn't cause much lag but makes it much better than normal.

--------------------------------------
If I should die, think only this of me:
That in some corner of a foreign field
There lies a plagiarist.
  • Registered: 2006-07-25
  • Posts: 1,224

Re: YT-1300s/Shuttles with interiors?

i believe that the BF2 engine (wich BF2142 runs on) doesnt allow for more than 6 players at a time in one vehicle. just look at the titan they could have easely fit more guns on it etc. and yet it only has 6 gunner seats

i agree that some ships should have interiors so you cant quickly switch between firing positions
also it just fun to explore inside and it opens up cool posibilities for video's

Compulsive doodler

http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/5913/sigcopync5.jpg
  • From: wales
  • Registered: 2006-05-13
  • Posts: 437

Re: YT-1300s/Shuttles with interiors?

8 players if you check in control options

Ex FS dev, FS tester

14 Reply by zanth91 (edited by zanth91 2006-11-12 11:47:42)

  • zanth91
  • zanth91
  • FirstStrike Tester
  • Offline
  • From: Houston, TX
  • Registered: 2006-02-04
  • Posts: 590

Re: YT-1300s/Shuttles with interiors?

I remember this post...

Is it true you can be inside a moving ship and be able to stand still in BF2142? This would be great news. IT would take some extra work (if you haven't already), but I would wait to for those ships to have insides you can all walk through. smile

http://www.usfbf1942.com/forums/image.php?u=158&amp;dateline=2006