Re: Update the 8th of November (Firehawke, YAY!)

Shadowfax wrote:

Hahaha-- you must not know about the goodness that is Wookiepedia! Check it out:
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/S-1_Fire … pulsortank
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Hell%27s_Hammers

Mmmm, yes. And lets not forgot what a horrible site it is to find ACCURATE info. lol wink Take it from me, do NOT quote Wookieepedia. IMO, it should just be scrapped. People are free to change what they like and don't like regardless if it's correct, and it seems like everyone has an agenda or opinion they use to skew info. Even with Star Wars.

Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.

16 (edited by mechag2 2007-11-09 22:50:44)

Re: Update the 8th of November (Firehawke, YAY!)

The new models look fantastic! I'm really liking the updated E-11 & MG-15 and the Firehawke & Freerunner look sick. The cockpit interior for the T-47 is awesome and I LOVE the gunner station (nice work and the Knight Rider Easter Egg, by the way wink). Major props to whoever did the mountains in the background, too.

That AT-AT model is IN-SANE. You guys nailed the proportions and look. All the little details look spot on... oh, man... *slobbers on keyboard* I can't wait to take this bad boy into the fray!

I'd love for the S3 Y-wing's gunner station to work the same as the T-47's. In fact that's exactly how I was hoping it was going to be in the begining. lol The main problem is that there's almost no ref material for it, so some Star Wars-ish imagination would have to do for the design. However, a basis for how it looks could actually be derived from the T-47, seeing as how the one's in Rebel service were heavily modified: the cockpit interiors were almost completely replaced by S3 Y-wing cockpits (with modifications, of course) and the extra armor plating & avionics package were taken from Y-wings.

Oh, and PLEEEAAAASE incorporate free look in vehicles! big_smile cool

Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.

Re: Update the 8th of November (Firehawke, YAY!)

Will be really fun to strafe and torpedo ground targets with an X-Wing.

"One of the bitches actually gave birth while she was attacking, and her puppies joined in on the carnage."
--the awesomeness that is Boatmurdered.

Re: Update the 8th of November (Firehawke, YAY!)

do you know what i would like. it the at-at ran around like a dog lol. i was just thinking about it and it made me laugh. anyway great models

http://www.fsmod.com/stats/fssig.php?player=btcc
Occupation: Hacker on steroids

INGAME NAME: btcc

Re: Update the 8th of November (Firehawke, YAY!)

hell`s hammer were rebulded after the battle for Turak IV. The rebel Hitak Harriers team ambush them
and nearly wiped out hells hammer but after the battle they got new tank`s (1-H Imperial-class repulsortank) and their 1-H tanks would have been more successful against the defending Rebels than General Veers's AT-ATs sorce:wikia

20 (edited by FSDev| TALON 2007-11-10 07:05:54)

Re: Update the 8th of November (Firehawke, YAY!)

I think if you look back at the Battle of Hoth the AT-AT Walkers did a pretty good job of taking out the Rebels. They lost what, 2 Walkers? And Echo Base was overrun in no time. It was an almost total victory for the Empire.

And besides, what would you have rather seen on screen, towering four legged metal walking behemoths?

Or a couple of boring old hovertanks?

wink

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v600/TALON_TAW/TALONSIGNEWB-1.jpg
http://stats.fsmod.com/fssig.php?player=Talon-UK
http://stats.fsmod.com/sig/pilot.Talon-UK.png

Re: Update the 8th of November (Firehawke, YAY!)

they was gonna use the Juggernaut but george wanten som new BIG armored ground unit so the at-at was born. In star wars the hell`s hammer had bin more effective. In the movies the at-at is the best thin ever