1 (edited by Stardestroyersarecool 2007-11-18 18:12:09)

Topic: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

We all know of the old star wars vs star trek arguement right? We all favour star wars right? (and hopefully) well here is the site that proves that star wars beats star trek. Lol slave 1 beats the enterprise. lol
Ps im not into Star Trek or this arguement but its good to know that sw wins.

http://stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes.html

First strike, playing from day one: SirKillsalot30

Resident Metal Gear Solid fan

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Of course, they aren't even remotely comparable.

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Heheh...hehehehehehe....hehehehehehehehehe.... ahhh Mike Wong. Valid on some points with an equally intollerant ego on everything else. Also very fond of oversating SW tech, understating ST tech, and ignoring anything he doesn't like.

Going by sheer numbers (ships verus ships and materials versus materials) a war between the Federation and Empire would be disasterous for the Federation (unless able to use thier plot devices >_>).

In the same token an Imperial invasion of the Milkyway Galaxy would be IMPOSSIBLE for ages as no Hyperspace Charts and routes exist and non-hyperspace travel is rediculously slow. This would allow for a good amount of time for preparation which in the end I still deem as irrellevent for the Federation.

If anyone is actually interested in this topic and wants to read a good Character DRIVEN (ergo not OMG TREK BASHES WAR or vice versa) check out TFC maybe post on the boards and join our crazy community wink. Remember we are focused on an intelligent story and not a senseless wankfest for fans.

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Lance Haith wrote:

Heheh...hehehehehehe....hehehehehehehehehe.... ahhh Mike Wong. Valid on some points with an equally intollerant ego on everything else. Also very fond of oversating SW tech, understating ST tech, and ignoring anything he doesn't like.

Going by sheer numbers (ships verus ships and materials versus materials) a war between the Federation and Empire would be disasterous for the Federation (unless able to use thier plot devices >_>).

In the same token an Imperial invasion of the Milkyway Galaxy would be IMPOSSIBLE for ages as no Hyperspace Charts and routes exist and non-hyperspace travel is rediculously slow. This would allow for a good amount of time for preparation which in the end I still deem as irrellevent for the Federation.

If anyone is actually interested in this topic and wants to read a good Character DRIVEN (ergo not OMG TREK BASHES WAR or vice versa) check out TFC maybe post on the boards and join our crazy community wink. Remember we are focused on an intelligent story and not a senseless wankfest for fans.

Its all what if you know.

First strike, playing from day one: SirKillsalot30

Resident Metal Gear Solid fan

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Empire > Federation

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a202/ty2d2/fsprsig2.gif
"Munchkin: One who, on being told that this is a game about politics and intrigue in 17th century Italy, asks to play a ninja."
Andrew Rilstone

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

is star trek a series or movie? hmm

MI CASA NO ES TÚ CASA
http://i171.photobucket.com/albums/u298/jdouglas0821/alamonightshot.jpg

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Heh, its a Science Fiction franchise that has movies and series. The series are funny, specifically the old ones. The show is alot different than SW.

And of course a Galaxy Spanning Military Dictactorship ruled by an Evil Magician would trump a tiny loosely affiliated group of planets whose focus is largely diplomatic.

wink Its common sense TY