Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

joel wrote:

besides SW whould win thay have more ships and can make more faster then the federation.
the federation does not have a lot of ships. ex: there were ony 12 constitution class ships (Enterprise, Defient, Constilation...) in the original serires and they lost 2 of them.

But there were thousands of other ships and classes besides the constitution class; this arguement is moved up to TNG era anyway.

the empire has tons of ship yards and does not take that long to build a ship
the federation has a few spacedocks and it takes mounths to build a ship.

The federation has many many spacedocks and ship yards, and has space docks and ship yards around every starbase and outpost. And both would take months to build a ship, otherwise you would have a poorly built ship.

http://forums.filefront.com/gallery/images/149556/2_Beat.jpeg
http://forums.filefront.com/gallery/images/149556/1_lenni5.jpeg
http://forums.filefront.com/gallery/images/149556/1_cash.jpeg
http://forums.filefront.com/gallery/images/149556/1_Vietnam.jpeg

128 (edited by joel 2007-12-16 20:46:35)

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

that was just an example. also there are not tons of ships for each class some have more than others yes, like there are more galaxy class then sovereign class.
and spacedocks are were they build the ships, starbases and outpost are used for refits and resuplys and there not around every one.
the empire still can build it s ships faster then the federation. it takes the federation weeks just to replicate the parts then they put it togeather over several mounths, run tons of systems checks, test flights, wepons checks, sencers, sheilds, life suport, power, internal sencers, and there fun stuff like hallowdecks, captins yatche on bigger ships, and they have to build the shuttle pods (of diffrent classes) for the ships, then they have to stock it with torpedoses (difrent types), then they have to put in programs like the EMH. they aso have to make sure the back up systems work.

in SW they just build the damn thing do a systems check, stock it, and send it on its way.

also there were not thousands, hundreds maybe.

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

They had the star forge in Star Wars also, you must remember that tongue

_________________________________________
Join the FS xfire group! http://xfire.com/clans/FSCG/

130 (edited by joel 2007-12-16 21:21:09)

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

yay they did and that built ships fast to.

but i think thats out of the time era of this discushion.

131

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Since both SW and ST are in different times, time doesn't really matter since, apparently, SW was a long time ago, and ST is in the future...

So really it doesn't matter when it was for either.

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a202/ty2d2/fsprsig2.gif
"Munchkin: One who, on being told that this is a game about politics and intrigue in 17th century Italy, asks to play a ninja."
Andrew Rilstone

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Which is kinda silly.

Why a Galaxy "A long long time ago" would have higher technology than a Futuristic Earth-based federation xD

but IMO

ST = SW, Why?

take each universe on its proportion, SW had a setting at least 10 times as larger than the ST quadrants, and if you proportionate evrything, a equal match may be found..

and as have been pointed out here, ST is towards diplomacy, and SW, well, is wars..

the link provided for a comparison is EXTREMELY biased towards SW, and the GW figures imo as EXTREMELY exaggerated

Re: Proof that star wars beats star trek.

Fools.  Freespace beats all.

Enterprise < Star Destroyer < GTVA Colossus

http://i47.tinypic.com/10xskg8.jpg